Patson Nikole D, Warren Tessa
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Aug;63(8):1516-32. doi: 10.1080/17470210903380822. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
The disruption that occurs in response to reading about implausible events in unambiguous sentences can be informative about the time course of semantic interpretation (e.g., Hagoort, Hald, Bastiaansen, & Petersson, 2004; Nieuwland & Van Berkum, 2006; Warren & McConnell, 2007). Two eye-tracking studies used implausible sentences to investigate whether local factors like the structural relationships and the distance between words cueing a plausibility violation influence how quickly those words are integrated into a global semantic interpretation. Experiment 1 suggested that eye-movement disruption was unaffected by the number of words intervening between the words cueing the implausibility. Experiment 2 demonstrated that eye-movement disruption to implausibility occurred along the same time course regardless of whether the words cueing the implausibility were in a theta-assigning relation or not. These results suggest that these local structural factors do not influence how quickly new words are integrated into a semantic representation, but rather the global event representation determines the time course over which implausibility is detected.
阅读明确句子中关于难以置信事件的描述时所出现的干扰,可能有助于了解语义解释的时间进程(例如,哈戈尔特、哈尔德、巴斯蒂安森和彼得松,2004年;纽兰德和范·贝库姆,2006年;沃伦和麦康奈尔,2007年)。两项眼动追踪研究使用了难以置信的句子,来探究诸如结构关系和提示合理性违背的词之间的距离等局部因素,是否会影响这些词被整合到全局语义解释中的速度。实验1表明,眼动干扰不受提示不合理性的词之间插入词数量的影响。实验2证明,无论提示不合理性的词是否处于赋格关系中,对不合理性的眼动干扰都在相同的时间进程中发生。这些结果表明,这些局部结构因素不会影响新词被整合到语义表征中的速度,而是全局事件表征决定了检测到不合理性的时间进程。