• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用个体化教育-辅导干预改善癌症疼痛医患沟通。

Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention.

机构信息

Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4234, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.009. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.009
PMID:19962845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2891619/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effect of a theoretically grounded, tailored education-coaching intervention to help patients more effectively discuss their pain-related questions, concerns, and preferences with physicians.

METHODS

Grounded in social-cognitive and communication theory, a tailored education-coaching (TEC) intervention was developed to help patients learn pain management and communication skills. In a RCT, 148 cancer patients agreed to have their consultations audio-recorded and were assigned to the intervention or a control group. The recordings were used to code for patients' questions, acts of assertiveness, and expressed concerns and to rate the quality of physicians' communication.

RESULTS

Patients in the TEC group discussed their pain concerns more than did patients in the control group. More active patients also had more baseline pain and interacted with physicians using participatory decision-making. Ratings of physicians' information about pain were higher when patients talked more about their pain concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates the efficacy of a theoretically grounded, coaching intervention to help cancer patients talk about pain control.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Coaching interventions can be effective resources for helping cancer patients communicate about their pain concerns if they are theoretically grounded, can be integrated within clinical routines, and lead to improve health outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验一种基于理论、量身定制的教育-辅导干预措施对帮助患者更有效地与医生讨论其疼痛相关问题、担忧和偏好的效果。

方法

该量身定制的教育-辅导(TEC)干预措施基于社会认知和沟通理论制定,旨在帮助患者学习疼痛管理和沟通技巧。在一项 RCT 中,148 名癌症患者同意将其咨询过程进行录音,并被分配到干预组或对照组。录音用于对患者的问题、自信行为、表达的担忧进行编码,并对医生沟通质量进行评分。

结果

与对照组相比,TEC 组的患者更多地讨论了他们的疼痛问题。更积极的患者也有更高的基线疼痛水平,并与医生一起使用参与式决策进行互动。当患者更多地谈论他们的疼痛问题时,他们对医生关于疼痛的信息评价更高。

结论

该研究证明了一种基于理论、辅导干预措施在帮助癌症患者谈论疼痛控制方面的有效性。

实践意义

如果辅导干预措施基于理论、可以融入临床常规、并能改善健康结果,那么它们可以成为帮助癌症患者沟通疼痛问题的有效资源。

相似文献

1
Improving physician-patient communication about cancer pain with a tailored education-coaching intervention.采用个体化教育-辅导干预改善癌症疼痛医患沟通。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.009. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
A pathway linking patient participation in cancer consultations to pain control.一条将患者参与癌症会诊与疼痛控制相联系的途径。
Psychooncology. 2014 Oct;23(10):1111-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3518. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
3
Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): study design and rationale for a tailored education and coaching intervention to enhance care of cancer-related pain.癌症无痛生活健康赋能(Ca-HELP):一项针对增强癌症相关疼痛护理的定制教育与指导干预措施的研究设计及原理
BMC Cancer. 2009 Sep 9;9:319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-319.
4
Associations between pain control self-efficacy, self-efficacy for communicating with physicians, and subsequent pain severity among cancer patients.癌症患者的疼痛控制自我效能感、与医生沟通自我效能感与随后疼痛严重程度之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):275-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
5
The clinical context and patient participation in post-diagnostic consultations.临床背景与患者在诊断后咨询中的参与情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
6
Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): effects of a tailored education and coaching intervention on pain and impairment.癌症患者无痛生活赋能(Ca-HELP):个性化教育和辅导干预对疼痛和功能障碍的影响。
Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1572-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.047. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
7
Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors.癌症沟通模式及患者特征的影响:信息提供与情感行为方面的差异
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
8
Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others.患者在医疗会诊中的参与度:为何有些患者比其他患者参与度更高。
Med Care. 2005 Oct;43(10):960-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70.
9
A randomized trial to improve patient-centered care and hypertension control in underserved primary care patients.一项旨在改善服务不足的初级保健患者以患者为中心的护理和高血压控制的随机试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26(11):1297-304. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1794-6. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
10
Measuring patient and physician participation in exchanges on medications: Dialogue Ratio, Preponderance of Initiative, and Dialogical Roles.衡量患者和医生在药物交流中的参与度:对话比率、主动性优势及对话角色。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):329-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.014. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanded care planning paradigm for older adults with type 2 diabetes: Rationale, design, and protocol of the PREPARE for Your Diabetes Care randomized trial.2型糖尿病老年患者的扩展护理计划范式:“为糖尿病护理做好准备”随机试验的原理、设计与方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Jun;153:107913. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107913. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
2
Investigation of the causal relationship between patient portal utilization and patient's self-care self-efficacy and satisfaction in care among patients with cancer.癌症患者使用患者门户网站与自我护理自我效能及护理满意度之间因果关系的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02837-0.
3
Fentanyl in cancer pain management: avoiding hasty judgments and discerning its potential benefits.芬太尼在癌症疼痛管理中的应用:避免仓促判断并识别其潜在益处。
Drugs Context. 2023 Dec 14;12. doi: 10.7573/dic.2023-10-2. eCollection 2023.
4
Planning for Your Advance Care Needs (PLAN): A Communication Intervention to Improve Advance Care Planning among Latino Patients with Advanced Cancer.为您的晚期护理需求做准备(PLAN):一项旨在改善晚期癌症拉丁裔患者的预立医疗照护计划的沟通干预措施。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 14;15(14):3623. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143623.
5
Provider implicit and explicit bias in person-centered maternity care: a cross-sectional study with maternity providers in Northern Ghana.以加纳北部的产妇服务提供者为对象的横断面研究:以人为中心的产妇护理中的提供者内隐和外显偏见。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09261-6.
6
Importance of Communication Skills Training and Meaning Centered Psychotherapy Concepts among Patients and Caregivers Coping with Advanced Cancer.在应对晚期癌症的患者及其照护者中,沟通技巧培训和以意义为中心的心理治疗概念的重要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054458.
7
Effects of Health and Wellness Coaching With an Adult Cancer Caregiver.健康与养生指导对成年癌症患者照顾者的影响。
Perm J. 2022 Jun 29;26(2):118-125. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.227. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
9
Towards a more patient-centered clinical trial process: A systematic review of interventions incorporating health literacy best practices.迈向更以患者为中心的临床试验流程:纳入健康素养最佳实践的干预措施的系统评价。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 May;116:106733. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106733. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
10
Helping Patients Communicate With Oncologists When Cancer Treatment Resistance Occurs to Develop, Test, and Implement a Patient Communication Aid: Sequential Collaborative Mixed Methods Study.当癌症治疗出现耐药时帮助患者与肿瘤学家沟通:开发、测试和实施患者沟通辅助工具的序贯协作混合方法研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 12;11(1):e26414. doi: 10.2196/26414.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Health Empowerment for Living without Pain (Ca-HELP): study design and rationale for a tailored education and coaching intervention to enhance care of cancer-related pain.癌症无痛生活健康赋能(Ca-HELP):一项针对增强癌症相关疼痛护理的定制教育与指导干预措施的研究设计及原理
BMC Cancer. 2009 Sep 9;9:319. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-319.
2
How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes.沟通如何促进康复?连接临床医生与患者沟通和健康结果的途径。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
3
(Mis)understanding in patient-health care provider communication about total knee replacement.患者与医疗服务提供者在全膝关节置换术沟通方面的(误)解
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jan 15;61(1):100-7. doi: 10.1002/art.24371.
4
Caregiver assessment of patients with advanced cancer: concordance with patients, effect of burden and positivity.晚期癌症患者的照顾者评估:与患者的一致性、负担及积极性的影响
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Jun 2;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-42.
5
Economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial of psycho-educational interventions to improve adjustment to survivorship among patients with breast cancer.在一项关于心理教育干预措施以改善乳腺癌患者对生存适应情况的临床试验中进行经济评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1684-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0822.
6
Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence.沟通干预对医患对话有影响:证据的系统评价
Med Care. 2007 Apr;45(4):340-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254516.04961.d5.
7
Cultural diversity in patient participation: the influence of patients' characteristics and doctors' communicative behaviour.患者参与中的文化多样性:患者特征与医生沟通行为的影响
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jul;67(1-2):214-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.018. Epub 2007 May 4.
8
Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor?医生与患者的沟通及认知:是取决于患者的外貌、谈吐,还是仅仅取决于医生?
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Aug;65(3):586-98. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.036. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
9
What are the essential elements to enable patient participation in medical decision making?使患者能够参与医疗决策的关键要素有哪些?
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):614-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0149-9.
10
Randomized controlled trial of a prompt list to help advanced cancer patients and their caregivers to ask questions about prognosis and end-of-life care.一项关于提示清单的随机对照试验,以帮助晚期癌症患者及其护理人员询问有关预后和临终关怀的问题。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Feb 20;25(6):715-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7827.