Ayllon David, Seoane Fernando, Gil-Pita Roberto
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:3779-82. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334494.
Since there are several applications of Electrical Bioimpedance (EBI) that use the Cole parameters as base of the analysis, to fit EBI measured data onto the Cole equation is a very common practice within Multifrequency-EBI and spectroscopy. The aim of this paper is to compare different fitting methods for EBI data in order to evaluate their suitability to fit the Cole equation and estimate the Cole parameters. Three of the studied fittings are based on the use of Non-Linear Least Squares on the Cole model, one using the real part only, a second using the imaginary part and the third using the complex impedance. Furthermore, a novel fitting method done on the Impedance plane, without using any frequency information has been implemented and included in the comparison. Results show that the four methods perform relatively well but the best fitting in terms of Standard Error of Estimate is the fitting obtained from the resistance only. The results support the possibility of measuring only the resistive part of the bioimpedance to accurately fit Cole equation and estimate the Cole parameters, with entailed advantages.
由于有几种生物电阻抗(EBI)应用以科尔参数作为分析基础,在多频EBI和光谱学中,将EBI测量数据拟合到科尔方程是一种非常常见的做法。本文的目的是比较EBI数据的不同拟合方法,以评估它们对拟合科尔方程和估计科尔参数的适用性。所研究的三种拟合方法基于在科尔模型上使用非线性最小二乘法,一种仅使用实部,第二种使用虚部,第三种使用复阻抗。此外,还实现了一种在阻抗平面上进行的、不使用任何频率信息的新型拟合方法并将其纳入比较。结果表明,这四种方法表现相对较好,但就估计标准误差而言,最佳拟合是仅从电阻获得的拟合。结果支持仅测量生物阻抗的电阻部分以准确拟合科尔方程并估计科尔参数的可能性,这具有相应的优势。