Health Policy Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Dec;11(6):543-54. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0210-1. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
The 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) showed that infectious disease outbreaks can have notable macroeconomic impacts. The current H1N1 and potential H5N1 flu pandemics could have a much greater impact. Using a multi-sector single country computable general equilibrium model of the United Kingdom, France, Belgium and The Netherlands, together with disease scenarios of varying severity, we examine the potential economic cost of a modern pandemic. Policies of school closure, vaccination and antivirals, together with prophylactic absence from work are evaluated and their cost impacts are estimated. Results suggest GDP losses from the disease of approximately 0.5-2% but school closure and prophylactic absenteeism more than triples these effects. Increasing school closures from 4 weeks at the peak to entire pandemic closure almost doubles the economic cost, but antivirals and vaccinations seem worthwhile. Careful planning is therefore important to ensure expensive policies to mitigate the pandemic are effective in minimising illness and deaths.
2003 年严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS)的爆发表明传染病爆发会对宏观经济产生显著影响。当前的 H1N1 流感和潜在的 H5N1 流感大流行可能会造成更大的影响。我们使用了英国、法国、比利时和荷兰四国的多部门单一国家可计算一般均衡模型,并结合不同严重程度的疾病情景,考察了现代大流行的潜在经济成本。我们评估了学校关闭、疫苗接种和抗病毒药物治疗,以及预防性旷工等政策,并估计了它们的成本影响。结果表明,疾病导致的 GDP 损失约为 0.5-2%,但学校关闭和预防性旷工使这些影响增加了两倍以上。将高峰时期的学校停课时间从 4 周增加到整个大流行期间停课几乎使经济成本增加了一倍,但抗病毒药物和疫苗接种似乎是值得的。因此,精心规划对于确保减轻大流行的昂贵政策能够有效减少疾病和死亡非常重要。