Suppr超能文献

客观与主观的建成环境指标,哪一种更能有效地捕捉与步行的关联?

Objective versus subjective measures of the built environment, which are most effective in capturing associations with walking?

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Program for the Ph.D. in Urban Design & Planning, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Health Place. 2010 Mar;16(2):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 14.

Abstract

This study compared the strength of association of objective and subjective measures of environment with walking sufficiently for health. It used an existing model, which employed only objective environmental measures and adjusted for socio-demographic covariates, to estimate the influence of the built environment on walking. The original model was re-run with new, subjectively measured variables. The results showed that objective measures of the built environment had stronger associations with walking than subjective measures. Future studies of the environmental influences on physical activity should include objective measures of the built environment.

摘要

本研究比较了客观和主观环境测量指标与足够健康的步行之间的关联强度。它使用了一个仅使用客观环境测量指标并调整了社会人口学协变量的现有模型来估计建筑环境对步行的影响。原始模型使用新的主观测量变量重新运行。结果表明,与主观测量相比,客观的建筑环境测量指标与步行的相关性更强。未来对环境对身体活动影响的研究应包括对建筑环境的客观测量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验