Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 14;4(12):e8184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008184.
Repeated antimalarial treatment for febrile episodes and self-treatment are common in malaria-endemic areas. The intake of antimalarials prior to participating in an in vivo study may alter treatment outcome and affect the interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. We report the findings from baseline plasma sampling of malaria patients prior to inclusion into an in vivo study in Tanzania and discuss the implications of residual concentrations of antimalarials in this setting.
In an in vivo study conducted in a rural area of Tanzania in 2008, baseline plasma samples from patients reporting no antimalarial intake within the last 28 days were screened for the presence of 14 antimalarials (parent drugs or metabolites) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Among the 148 patients enrolled, 110 (74.3%) had at least one antimalarial in their plasma: 80 (54.1%) had lumefantrine above the lower limit of calibration (LLC = 4 ng/mL), 7 (4.7%) desbutyl-lumefantrine (4 ng/mL), 77 (52.0%) sulfadoxine (0.5 ng/mL), 15 (10.1%) pyrimethamine (0.5 ng/mL), 16 (10.8%) quinine (2.5 ng/mL) and none chloroquine (2.5 ng/mL).
The proportion of patients with detectable antimalarial drug levels prior to enrollment into the study is worrying. Indeed artemether-lumefantrine was supposed to be available only at government health facilities. Although sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is only recommended for intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), it was still widely used in public and private health facilities and sold in drug shops. Self-reporting of previous drug intake is unreliable and thus screening for the presence of antimalarial drug levels should be considered in future in vivo studies to allow for accurate assessment of treatment outcome. Furthermore, persisting sub-therapeutic drug levels of antimalarials in a population could promote the spread of drug resistance. The knowledge on drug pressure in a given population is important to monitor standard treatment policy implementation.
在疟疾流行地区,发热患者反复接受抗疟治疗和自行治疗很常见。在参与体内研究之前摄入抗疟药物可能会改变治疗结果,并影响对疗效和安全性结果的解释。我们报告了在坦桑尼亚进行的一项体内研究之前对疟疾患者进行基线血浆采样的结果,并讨论了在这种情况下残留抗疟药物浓度的影响。
在 2008 年坦桑尼亚农村地区进行的一项体内研究中,对报告在过去 28 天内未服用抗疟药物的患者的基线血浆样本进行了筛查,使用液相色谱-串联质谱法检测了 14 种抗疟药物(母体药物或代谢物)的存在。在纳入的 148 名患者中,有 110 名(74.3%)患者的血浆中至少有一种抗疟药物:80 名(54.1%)患者的青蒿素浓度高于校准下限(LLC=4ng/mL),7 名(4.7%)患者的去丁基青蒿素浓度高于校准下限(4ng/mL),77 名(52.0%)患者的磺胺多辛浓度高于校准下限(0.5ng/mL),15 名(10.1%)患者的氨苯砜浓度高于校准下限(0.5ng/mL),16 名(10.8%)患者的奎宁浓度高于校准下限(2.5ng/mL),而无氯喹浓度高于校准下限(2.5ng/mL)。
在纳入研究之前,有检测到抗疟药物水平的患者比例令人担忧。事实上,青蒿琥酯-蒿甲醚本应仅在政府卫生机构提供。尽管磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶仅推荐用于间歇性预防治疗(IPTp),但它仍广泛用于公立和私立卫生机构,并在药店销售。以前药物摄入的自我报告不可靠,因此在未来的体内研究中应考虑筛查抗疟药物水平的存在,以允许对治疗结果进行准确评估。此外,在人群中持续存在亚治疗水平的抗疟药物可能会促进耐药性的传播。了解特定人群中的药物压力对于监测标准治疗政策的实施非常重要。