Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision-Making (CREED), University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 11, 1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Science. 2009 Dec 18;326(5960):1701-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1178883.
Many people incur costs to reward strangers who have been kind to others. Theoretical and experimental evidence suggests that such "indirect rewarding" sustains cooperation between unrelated humans. Its emergence is surprising, because rewarders incur costs but receive no immediate benefits. It can prevail in the long run only if rewarders earn higher payoffs than "defectors" who ignore strangers' kindness. We provide experimental evidence regarding the payoffs received by individuals who employ these and other strategies, such as "indirect punishment," by imposing costs on unkind strangers. We find that if unkind strangers cannot be punished, defection earns most. If they can be punished, however, then indirect rewarding earns most. Indirect punishment plays this important role, even if it gives a low payoff and is rarely implemented.
许多人为了奖励善待他人的陌生人而付出代价。理论和实验证据表明,这种“间接奖励”可以维持不同个体之间的合作。这种现象的出现令人惊讶,因为奖励者付出了代价,但没有立即得到好处。只有当奖励者获得的回报高于忽视陌生人善意的“背叛者”时,这种奖励才能长期存在。我们提供了关于个体使用这些策略(如“间接惩罚”,对不友善的陌生人施加成本)所获得回报的实验证据。我们发现,如果不友善的陌生人不能受到惩罚,那么背叛者将获得最大收益。然而,如果他们可以受到惩罚,那么间接奖励将获得最大收益。即使间接惩罚回报较低且很少实施,它也扮演着重要的角色。