Department of Psychology, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043, USA.
Neuroimage. 2010 Mar;50(1):56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.024. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
Functional localizers are routinely used in neuroimaging studies to test hypotheses about the function of specific brain areas. The specific tasks and stimuli used to localize particular regions vary widely from study to study even when the same cortical region is targeted. Thus, it is important to ask whether task and stimulus changes lead to differences in localization or whether localization procedures are largely immune to differences in tasks and contrasting stimuli. We present two experiments and a literature review that explore whether face localizer tasks yield differential localization in the fusiform gyrus as a function of task and contrasting stimuli. We tested standard localization tasks-passive viewing, 1-back, and 2-back memory tests--and did not find differences in localization based on task. We did, however, find differences in the extent, strength and patterns/reliabilities of the activation in the fusiform gyrus based on comparison stimuli (faces vs. houses compared to faces vs. scrambled stimuli).
功能定位器在神经影像学研究中被常规用于测试特定脑区功能的假设。即使目标是相同的皮质区域,用于定位特定区域的特定任务和刺激在不同研究中也有很大差异。因此,重要的是要问任务和刺激的变化是否会导致定位的差异,或者定位程序是否在很大程度上不受任务和对比刺激的差异的影响。我们提出了两个实验和一个文献综述,探讨了作为任务和对比刺激函数的面定位器任务是否会导致梭状回的定位差异。我们测试了标准的定位任务——被动观察、1 回和 2 回记忆测试——但没有发现基于任务的定位差异。然而,我们确实发现了基于比较刺激(与面孔相比的房子与与面孔相比的杂乱刺激)的梭状回激活的程度、强度和模式/可靠性存在差异。