Out L, Van Soest A J, Savelsbergh G J, Hopkins B
Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement Sciences Amsterdam-Nijmegen Faculty of Human Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Mot Behav. 1998 Sep;30(3):260-72. doi: 10.1080/00222899809601341.
Infants of about 5 months of age who have just mastered the ability to reach succeed more frequently in contacting an object when they are seated upright than when they are supine or reclined. That effect of posture disappears in the subsequent months. Whether that effect can be attributed either to insufficient muscular strength or to insufficient control over the mechanically unstable arm was the subject of the present investigation. Kinematics and electromyography (EMG) of reaching movements of 8 sitting and supine infants at 12, 16, and 20 weeks of age were recorded. Maximum levels of shoulder torque as well as kinematic stability measures were similar in both postures. Coactivation levels and the frequency of on-off switching of muscles turned out to be higher in the sitting than in the supine posture. The authors suggest that the difference in reaching behavior resulted from the degree of error in the feedforward control signal that was allowed by the different postures rather than either insufficient muscular strength or insufficient control over the mechanically unstable arm.
刚掌握够物能力的约5个月大婴儿,在直立坐姿时比仰卧或斜躺时更频繁地成功够到物体。这种姿势效应在随后几个月消失。这种效应是可归因于肌肉力量不足还是对机械不稳定手臂的控制不足,是本研究的主题。记录了8名12、16和20周龄婴儿在坐姿和仰卧姿势下够物动作的运动学和肌电图(EMG)。两种姿势下的肩部扭矩最大水平以及运动稳定性指标相似。结果发现,坐姿时肌肉的共同激活水平和开-关切换频率高于仰卧姿势。作者认为,够物行为的差异是由不同姿势所允许的前馈控制信号的误差程度导致的,而非肌肉力量不足或对机械不稳定手臂的控制不足。