Department of Medical Microbiology, Center for Laboratory Medicine, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne 16, CH 6000, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):720-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01890-09. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
The hospital epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has changed in the past few years due to the encroachment of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains into health care settings. MRSA strains that were isolated during a 2-year period from patients of the Luzerner Kantonsspital were analyzed to elucidate their epidemiology. Moreover, extended surveillance of individuals who were contacts of those patients was carried out for 6 months to identify the routes of spread and to assess the quality of the infection control measures used in our setting. Patient data were collected to distinguish CA-MRSA strains from health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains by epidemiological criteria, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). On the basis of the CDC definition, the majority of the strains were considered to be HA-MRSA. However, 87% of them belonged to staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types IV and V, which are traditionally associated with CA-MRSA. Surprisingly, classical nosocomial SCCmec types I and II represented a minority, whereas SCCmec type III was completely absent. By PFGE analysis, four predominant clonal lineages and 21 highly variable sporadic genotypes were detected. Twenty-eight percent of the MRSA strains studied carried the genes encoding the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), of which 21% and 83% were associated with SCCmec types IV and V, respectively. Among 289 contact individuals screened for MRSA carriage throughout the extended surveillance, a single secondary patient was discovered. The possibility of nosocomial transmission could be excluded. The high proportions of SCCmec type IV and V strains as well as PVL-positive strains suggest strong infiltration of CA-MRSA into our institution. Moreover, the low endemic prevalence of MRSA demonstrates that current infection control measures are sufficient to limit its spreading and the emergence of large epidemic outbreaks.
近年来,由于社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)菌株侵入医疗机构,医院内耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的流行病学发生了变化。对来自卢塞恩州立医院患者的 2 年间分离的 MRSA 菌株进行了分析,以阐明其流行病学特征。此外,对这些患者的接触者进行了 6 个月的扩展监测,以确定传播途径,并评估我们设定中使用的感染控制措施的质量。通过流行病学标准(由疾病预防控制中心 (CDC) 定义)收集患者数据,以区分 CA-MRSA 菌株和与医疗机构相关的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(HA-MRSA)菌株。根据 CDC 的定义,大多数菌株被认为是 HA-MRSA。然而,它们中有 87%属于传统上与 CA-MRSA 相关的葡萄球菌盒染色体 mec(SCCmec)类型 IV 和 V。令人惊讶的是,经典的医院内 SCCmec 类型 I 和 II 占少数,而 SCCmec 类型 III 完全不存在。通过 PFGE 分析,检测到 4 种主要的克隆谱系和 21 种高度可变的散发性基因型。所研究的 MRSA 菌株中有 28%携带编码潘顿-瓦伦丁白细胞毒素(PVL)的基因,其中 21%和 83%分别与 SCCmec 类型 IV 和 V 相关。在整个扩展监测期间对 289 名接触者进行了 MRSA 携带筛查,仅发现了 1 名继发性患者。可以排除医院内传播的可能性。SCCmec 类型 IV 和 V 以及 PVL 阳性菌株的高比例表明 CA-MRSA 已大量渗透到我们的机构中。此外,MRSA 的低地方性流行率表明,目前的感染控制措施足以限制其传播和大流行爆发的出现。