• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量阿奇霉素与七天阿莫西林治疗原住民儿童急性中耳炎(AATAAC):一项双盲、随机对照试验。

Single-dose azithromycin versus seven days of amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media in Aboriginal children (AATAAC): a double blind, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2010 Jan 4;192(1):24-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03396.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03396.x
PMID:20047544
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness of single-dose azithromycin treatment with 7 days of amoxycillin treatment among Aboriginal children with acute otitis media (AOM) in rural and remote communities in the Northern Territory.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Aboriginal children aged 6 months to 6 years living in 16 rural and remote communities were screened for AOM. Those diagnosed with AOM were randomly allocated to receive either azithromycin (30 mg/kg as a single dose) or amoxycillin (50mg/kg/day in two divided doses for a minimum of 7 days). We used a double-dummy method to ensure blinding. Our study was conducted from 24 March 2003 to 20 July 2005.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Failure to cure AOM by the end of therapy; nasal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and non-capsular Haemophilus influenzae (NCHi).

RESULTS

We followed 306 of 320 children (96%) allocated to the treatment groups. Single-dose azithromycin did not reduce (or increase) the risk of clinical failure (50% failure rate [82/165]) compared with amoxycillin (54% failure rate [83/155]) (risk difference [RD], - 4% [95% CI, - 15% to 7%]; P = 0.504). Compared with amoxycillin, azithromycin significantly reduced the proportion of children with nasal carriage of S. pneumoniae (27% v 63%; RD, - 36% [95% CI, - 47% to - 26%]; P < 0.001) and NCHi (55% v 85%; RD, - 30% [95% CI, - 40% to - 21%]; P < 0.001). Nasal carriage of S. pneumoniae with intermediate or full resistance to penicillin was lower (but not significantly so) in the azithromycin group (10% v 16%), but this group had significantly increased carriage of azithromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae (10% v 3%; RD, 7% [95% CI, 0.1% to 12%]; P = 0.001). Carriage of beta-lactamase-producing NCHi was about 5% in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Although azithromycin reduced nasal carriage of S. pneumoniae and NCHi, clinical failure was high in both treatment groups. The possibility of weekly azithromycin treatment in children with persistent AOM should be evaluated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12609000691246.

摘要

目的

比较单次剂量阿奇霉素与 7 天阿莫西林治疗北领地农村和偏远社区土著儿童急性中耳炎(AOM)的临床疗效。

设计、地点和参与者:对居住在 16 个农村和偏远社区的 6 个月至 6 岁的土著儿童进行 AOM 筛查。那些被诊断患有 AOM 的儿童被随机分配接受阿奇霉素(30mg/kg 作为单次剂量)或阿莫西林(50mg/kg/天,分两次服用,至少 7 天)。我们使用双盲法确保了盲法。我们的研究于 2003 年 3 月 24 日至 2005 年 7 月 20 日进行。

主要结局测量

治疗结束时未治愈 AOM;鼻咽携带肺炎链球菌和非荚膜流感嗜血杆菌(NCHi)。

结果

我们随访了 306 名(96%)分配到治疗组的儿童中的 320 名。与阿莫西林相比,单次剂量阿奇霉素并未降低(或增加)临床失败的风险(50%的失败率[82/165])(风险差异[RD],-4%[95%CI,-15%至 7%];P=0.504)。与阿莫西林相比,阿奇霉素显著降低了携带鼻咽部肺炎链球菌的儿童比例(27%对 63%)(RD,-36%[95%CI,-47%至-26%])(P<0.001)和携带鼻咽部非荚膜流感嗜血杆菌的儿童比例(55%对 85%)(RD,-30%[95%CI,-40%至-21%])(P<0.001)。对青霉素中介或完全耐药的肺炎链球菌的鼻咽携带率较低(但不显著),阿奇霉素组为 10%(16%),但该组对阿奇霉素耐药的肺炎链球菌携带率显著增加(10%对 3%)(RD,7%[95%CI,0.1%至 12%]);P=0.001)。两组β-内酰胺酶产生的 NCHi 的携带率约为 5%。

结论

尽管阿奇霉素降低了鼻咽部肺炎链球菌和 NCHi 的携带率,但两组的临床失败率均较高。每周用阿奇霉素治疗持续性 AOM 的儿童的可能性应进行评估。

试验注册

澳大利亚临床试验注册 ACTRN 12609000691246。

相似文献

1
Single-dose azithromycin versus seven days of amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media in Aboriginal children (AATAAC): a double blind, randomised controlled trial.单剂量阿奇霉素与七天阿莫西林治疗原住民儿童急性中耳炎(AATAAC):一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Med J Aust. 2010 Jan 4;192(1):24-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03396.x.
2
Large dosage amoxicillin/clavulanate, compared with azithromycin, for the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media in children.大剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸与阿奇霉素治疗儿童细菌性急性中耳炎的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Jun;24(6):525-32. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000164794.50281.1a.
3
Effects of amoxicillin/clavulanate or azithromycin on nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in children with acute otitis media.阿莫西林/克拉维酸或阿奇霉素对急性中耳炎患儿肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌鼻咽部携带情况的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Oct;31(4):875-80. doi: 10.1086/318160. Epub 2000 Oct 25.
4
A randomized, multicenter, double blind, double dummy trial of single dose azithromycin versus high dose amoxicillin for treatment of uncomplicated acute otitis media.单剂量阿奇霉素与高剂量阿莫西林治疗非复杂性急性中耳炎的随机、多中心、双盲、双模拟试验
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Feb;24(2):153-61. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000151024.11703.4a.
5
Bacterial etiology of acute otitis media and clinical efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate versus azithromycin.急性中耳炎的细菌病因及阿莫西林-克拉维酸与阿奇霉素的临床疗效
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 May;70(5):915-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
6
High-dose azithromycin versus high-dose amoxicillin-clavulanate for treatment of children with recurrent or persistent acute otitis media.大剂量阿奇霉素与大剂量阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗复发性或持续性急性中耳炎患儿的疗效比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Oct;47(10):3179-86. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3179-3186.2003.
7
Nonsevere acute otitis media: a clinical trial comparing outcomes of watchful waiting versus immediate antibiotic treatment.非重度急性中耳炎:一项比较观察等待与立即抗生素治疗效果的临床试验。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1455-65. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1665.
8
Amoxicillin-sulbactam versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for the treatment of non-recurrent-acute otitis media in Argentinean children.阿莫西林-舒巴坦与阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗阿根廷儿童非复发性急性中耳炎的疗效比较
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Sep;69(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.016.
9
The clinical course of acute otitis media in high-risk Australian Aboriginal children: a longitudinal study.澳大利亚高危原住民儿童急性中耳炎的临床病程:一项纵向研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2005 Jun 14;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-5-16.
10
Bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of high dose amoxicillin for therapy of acute otitis media in children.大剂量阿莫西林治疗儿童急性中耳炎的细菌学及临床疗效
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 May;22(5):405-13. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000065688.21336.fa.

引用本文的文献

1
Can non-typeable carriage surveillance data infer antimicrobial resistance associated with otitis media?不可分型携带监测数据能否推断与中耳炎相关的抗菌药物耐药性?
Pediatr Investig. 2023 Feb 7;7(1):13-22. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12364. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Exploring the Reported Strengths and Limitations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research: A Narrative Review of Intervention Studies.探索原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民健康研究报告的优势和局限性:干预研究的叙述性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053993.
3
Reducing exacerbations in children and adults with primary ciliary dyskinesia using erdosteine and/or azithromycin therapy (REPEAT trial): study protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, 2×2 partial factorial, randomised controlled trial.
采用厄多司坦和/或阿奇霉素治疗原发性纤毛运动障碍患儿和成人减少恶化(REPEAT 试验):一项多中心、双盲、双模拟、2×2 部分析因、随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001236.
4
BIGDATA: A Protocol to Create and Extend a 25-Year Clinical Trial and Observational Data Asset to Address Key Knowledge Gaps in Otitis Media and Hearing Loss in Australian Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Children.大数据:创建并扩展一项为期25年的临床试验及观察性数据资产的方案,以填补澳大利亚原住民和非原住民儿童中耳炎与听力损失方面的关键知识空白。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 14;10:804373. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.804373. eCollection 2022.
5
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate for otitis media in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿奇霉素和阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童中耳炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021 Apr 24;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00434-x.
6
Otitis media guidelines for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children: summary of recommendations.澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民儿童中耳炎指南:推荐意见摘要。
Med J Aust. 2021 Mar;214(5):228-233. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50953. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
7
The unsolved problem of otitis media in indigenous populations: a systematic review of upper respiratory and middle ear microbiology in indigenous children with otitis media.原住民人群中耳炎未解决的问题:对患有中耳炎的原住民儿童上呼吸道和中耳微生物的系统综述。
Microbiome. 2018 Nov 5;6(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0577-2.
8
Defining lower airway bacterial infection in children with chronic endobronchial disorders.定义儿童慢性支气管疾病下呼吸道细菌感染。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018 Feb;53(2):224-232. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23931. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
Geographic consistency in dominant, non-typeable genotypes colonising four distinct Australian paediatric groups: a cohort study.一项队列研究:在四个不同的澳大利亚儿科群体中定殖的主要非分型基因型的地理一致性。
Pneumonia (Nathan). 2016 Aug 18;8:13. doi: 10.1186/s41479-016-0013-y. eCollection 2016.
10
Macrolide resistance in pneumococci-is it relevant?肺炎球菌对大环内酯类药物的耐药性——这有关系吗?
Pneumonia (Nathan). 2016 Jul 7;8:10. doi: 10.1186/s41479-016-0010-1. eCollection 2016.