Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Spinal Cord. 2010 Sep;48(9):652-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.155. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
Systematic review.
The applied definition of traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS) lacks specific quantified diagnostic criteria.
To review currently applied TCCS diagnostic criteria and quantitative data regarding the 'disproportionate weakness' between the upper and lower extremities described in original studies reporting on TCCS subjects.
A MEDLINE (1966 to 2008) literature search was conducted. The descriptors applied to define TCCS were extracted from all included articles. We included original studies that reported on the differences in motor score (based on the Medical Research Council scale) between the total upper extremity motor score (UEMS) and the total lower extremity motor score (LEMS), in a minimum of five TCCS patients at the time of hospital admission. The mean difference between the total UEMS and the total LEMS of the patients included in each study was calculated. Case reports were excluded.
None of the identified studies on TCCS patients reported inclusion and/or exclusion criteria using a quantified difference between the UEMS and LEMS. Out of 30 retrieved studies, we identified seven different clinical descriptors that have been applied as TCCS diagnostic criteria. Nine studies reporting on a total of 312 TCCS patients were eligible for analysis. The mean total UEMS was 10.5 motor points lower than the mean total LEMS.
There is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria for TCCS. Nevertheless, this review revealed an average of 10 motor points between the UEMS and LEMS as a possible TCCS diagnostic criterion. However, further discussion by an expert panel will be required to establish definitive diagnostic criteria.
系统评价。
创伤性中央脊髓综合征(TCCS)的应用定义缺乏具体的量化诊断标准。
回顾目前应用的 TCCS 诊断标准以及原始研究中报告 TCCS 患者时描述的上下肢之间“不成比例的无力”的定量数据。
进行了 MEDLINE(1966 年至 2008 年)文献检索。从所有纳入的文章中提取用于定义 TCCS 的描述符。我们纳入了原始研究,这些研究报告了在入院时至少有 5 例 TCCS 患者的总上肢运动评分(UEMS)和总下肢运动评分(LEMS)之间的运动评分差异,计算了每个研究中纳入的患者的总 UEMS 和总 LEMS 的平均差异。排除病例报告。
没有一项关于 TCCS 患者的研究报告使用 UEMS 和 LEMS 之间的量化差异来报告纳入和/或排除标准。在 30 篇检索到的 TCCS 患者研究中,我们确定了 7 种不同的临床描述符,这些描述符已被用作 TCCS 诊断标准。有 9 项研究报告了总共 312 例 TCCS 患者的研究结果符合纳入标准。总 UEMS 平均比总 LEMS 低 10.5 个运动点。
目前尚无关于 TCCS 诊断标准的共识。然而,本综述显示,UEMS 和 LEMS 之间平均有 10 个运动点可能作为 TCCS 的诊断标准。但是,需要专家组进一步讨论才能确定明确的诊断标准。