• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性中央脊髓损伤综合征的诊断标准。第 1 部分:临床描述符和评分的系统评价。

Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 1: a systematic review of clinical descriptors and scores.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2010 Sep;48(9):652-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.155. Epub 2010 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1038/sc.2009.155
PMID:20048754
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

BACKGROUND

The applied definition of traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS) lacks specific quantified diagnostic criteria.

OBJECTIVE

To review currently applied TCCS diagnostic criteria and quantitative data regarding the 'disproportionate weakness' between the upper and lower extremities described in original studies reporting on TCCS subjects.

METHODS

A MEDLINE (1966 to 2008) literature search was conducted. The descriptors applied to define TCCS were extracted from all included articles. We included original studies that reported on the differences in motor score (based on the Medical Research Council scale) between the total upper extremity motor score (UEMS) and the total lower extremity motor score (LEMS), in a minimum of five TCCS patients at the time of hospital admission. The mean difference between the total UEMS and the total LEMS of the patients included in each study was calculated. Case reports were excluded.

RESULTS

None of the identified studies on TCCS patients reported inclusion and/or exclusion criteria using a quantified difference between the UEMS and LEMS. Out of 30 retrieved studies, we identified seven different clinical descriptors that have been applied as TCCS diagnostic criteria. Nine studies reporting on a total of 312 TCCS patients were eligible for analysis. The mean total UEMS was 10.5 motor points lower than the mean total LEMS.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus on the diagnostic criteria for TCCS. Nevertheless, this review revealed an average of 10 motor points between the UEMS and LEMS as a possible TCCS diagnostic criterion. However, further discussion by an expert panel will be required to establish definitive diagnostic criteria.

摘要

研究设计

系统评价。

背景

创伤性中央脊髓综合征(TCCS)的应用定义缺乏具体的量化诊断标准。

目的

回顾目前应用的 TCCS 诊断标准以及原始研究中报告 TCCS 患者时描述的上下肢之间“不成比例的无力”的定量数据。

方法

进行了 MEDLINE(1966 年至 2008 年)文献检索。从所有纳入的文章中提取用于定义 TCCS 的描述符。我们纳入了原始研究,这些研究报告了在入院时至少有 5 例 TCCS 患者的总上肢运动评分(UEMS)和总下肢运动评分(LEMS)之间的运动评分差异,计算了每个研究中纳入的患者的总 UEMS 和总 LEMS 的平均差异。排除病例报告。

结果

没有一项关于 TCCS 患者的研究报告使用 UEMS 和 LEMS 之间的量化差异来报告纳入和/或排除标准。在 30 篇检索到的 TCCS 患者研究中,我们确定了 7 种不同的临床描述符,这些描述符已被用作 TCCS 诊断标准。有 9 项研究报告了总共 312 例 TCCS 患者的研究结果符合纳入标准。总 UEMS 平均比总 LEMS 低 10.5 个运动点。

结论

目前尚无关于 TCCS 诊断标准的共识。然而,本综述显示,UEMS 和 LEMS 之间平均有 10 个运动点可能作为 TCCS 的诊断标准。但是,需要专家组进一步讨论才能确定明确的诊断标准。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 1: a systematic review of clinical descriptors and scores.创伤性中央脊髓损伤综合征的诊断标准。第 1 部分:临床描述符和评分的系统评价。
Spinal Cord. 2010 Sep;48(9):652-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.155. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
2
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer.针对儿童癌症治疗期间及治疗后的儿童和青少年的体育锻炼训练干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD008796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008796.pub3.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of early vs. delayed surgery on outcomes in cervical spinal cord injury without fracture or dislocation.早期手术与延迟手术对无骨折或脱位的颈脊髓损伤患者预后的影响。
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 13;12:1619141. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1619141. eCollection 2025.
2
Traumatic central cord Syndrome: An integrated neurosurgical and neurocritical care perspective.创伤性中央脊髓综合征:神经外科与神经重症监护综合视角
Brain Spine. 2025 May 17;5:104281. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104281. eCollection 2025.
3
Spinal cord injury: Current trends in acute management.
脊髓损伤:急性处理的当前趋势
Brain Spine. 2024 Apr 7;4:102803. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102803. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical Subsets of Central Cord Syndrome: Is It a Distinct Entity from Other Forms of Incomplete Tetraplegia for Research?中央索综合征的临床亚型:它是否是与其他形式不完全四肢瘫痪不同的研究实体?
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep;41(17-18):2133-2145. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0613. Epub 2024 May 9.
5
Pathophysiology and surgical decision-making in central cord syndrome and degenerative cervical myelopathy: correcting the somatotopic fallacy.中央脊髓综合征和退行性颈椎脊髓病的病理生理学与手术决策:纠正躯体定位错误观念
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 17;14:1276399. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1276399. eCollection 2023.
6
[Risk factors associated with lethality on patients with central cord syndrome].[与中央脊髓综合征患者致死率相关的危险因素]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Oct 2;61(Suppl 3):S437-S444. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8319828.
7
Validation of a New Tool to Detect and Characterize Spinal Cord Injury in the Acute Trauma Patient: The Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.一种用于检测和描述急性创伤患者脊髓损伤的新工具的验证:蒙特利尔急性脊髓损伤分类法
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):594-602. doi: 10.1177/21925682231202447. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
8
Central cord syndrome definitions, variations and limitations.中央索综合征的定义、变化和局限性。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Nov;61(11):579-586. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00894-2. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
9
The clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C device vs. plate-cage in managing traumatic central cord syndrome.采用ROI-C装置与钢板椎间融合器行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗创伤性中央脊髓综合征的临床疗效比较
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1055317. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1055317. eCollection 2022.
10
Sensitivity and specificity of the 'knee-up test' for estimation of the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale in patients with acute motor incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.用于评估急性运动不完全性颈脊髓损伤患者美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表的“抬腿试验”的敏感性和特异性。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Apr;56(4):347-354. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0046-y. Epub 2017 Dec 28.