Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Free University of Berlin, Oskar-Helene-Heim, Clayallee 229, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 1993 Dec;2(4):223-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00299450.
A retrospective study was carried out on a total of 491 patients (294 male, 197 female) who underwent surgery between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 1986. They were treated by minimal intervention lumbar discectomy without the use of a microscope. The patient groups consisted of 241 patients who needed a second operation (MOP, multiple operations) and another 250 patients who needed only one surgical procedure (SOP, single operation) and the whole treatment period was between 1 January 1980 and 31 December 1990. The SOP patients served as control group. The MOP and SOP groups were compared in the search for clinical and/or morphological parameters which might distinguish the two groups at the time of first operation.
In terms of history, age, sex distribution, pre-operative treatment and severity of neurological symptoms there was no statistical difference between the two groups at the time of the first operation. Radiological examinations were more extensive but less conclusive in the MOP group. In the SOP patients, subligamentous and epidural disc fragments occurred in 67.2% of patients. In the MOP patients disc protrusions or small subligamentous extrusions were predominant (50.1%) at the time of the first operation. Osteochondritic changes occurred less frequently in the MOP (39.1% vs 53.6%). There were significantly more two-level approaches in the MOP patients (31.5% vs 14.4%); also, the surgical technique in the MOP group was less invasive, often being 'explorative' in character. Post-operative morbidity was higher, improvement of neurological symptoms was slower and the overall result was worse in MOP patients after the first operation. Interpretation of radiological findings, disc morphology and surgical technique are usually considered factors influencing the outcome of disc surgery. At the second operation (MOP 2) there were epidural scars in 48.4% of patients and the incidence of disc fragments containing parts of the end-plate increased from 10.1% to 61.9%. The prognosis was worse in patients with mild pre-operative disc degeneration.
回顾性分析 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 1986 年 12 月 31 日接受微创手术治疗的 491 例患者(男 294 例,女 197 例)的临床资料。这些患者接受的是单纯减压术,没有使用显微镜。患者分为两组:241 例患者需要再次手术(MOP,多次手术),250 例患者仅接受一次手术(SOP,单次手术),手术时间为 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 1990 年 12 月 31 日。SOP 患者为对照组。在首次手术时,对 MOP 组和 SOP 组进行了临床和/或形态参数比较,以寻找两组之间的区别。
在病史、年龄、性别分布、术前治疗和神经症状严重程度方面,两组患者在首次手术时没有统计学差异。MOP 组的影像学检查更广泛,但结论性较差。SOP 患者中,硬膜下和硬膜外椎间盘碎片的发生率为 67.2%。在 MOP 患者中,首次手术时椎间盘突出或小的硬膜下突出更为常见(50.1%)。MOP 患者的骨软骨病变发生率较低(39.1%对 53.6%)。MOP 患者的双节段入路明显较多(31.5%对 14.4%);此外,MOP 患者的手术技术创伤较小,通常具有“探索性”特征。MOP 患者术后发病率较高,神经症状改善较慢,首次手术后总体疗效较差。影像学发现、椎间盘形态和手术技术的解释通常被认为是影响椎间盘手术结果的因素。在第二次手术(MOP2)中,48.4%的患者有硬膜外瘢痕,含有终板部分的椎间盘碎片发生率从 10.1%增加到 61.9%。术前椎间盘退变较轻的患者预后较差。