意大利商业益生菌食品补充剂的全国调查结果。

National survey outcomes on commercial probiotic food supplements in Italy.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria e Sicurezza Alimentare, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Feb 28;137(2-3):265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.016. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

Abstract

To assess whether the probiotic food supplements, produced and distributed on the Italian market during 2005-2006, complied with the Italian Guidelines on Prebiotics and Probiotics, 72 samples from 29 processing plants were analyzed. The survey included 41 samples from processing plants and 31 samples of the same brand from retailers collected at timed intervals (3, 8 and 13 months). A polyphasic approach based on a suitable analytical collection method (genotypic identification of total bacteria - differential presumptive enumeration - genotypic identification of viable bacteria) was adopted to identify and quantify the microorganisms labelled and recovered from the probiotic supplements examined. Most supplements analyzed (87%) did not conform to the Italian guidelines and the differences were both quantitative and qualitative (number determination, purity, types and viability of microorganisms). Even though most labelled supplements (25 samples) indicated the presence of Bifidobacterium bifidum, this organism was only detected sporadically and always as dead cells. Unexpected results were obtained during our survey due to the absence of viability of Bacillus coagulans spores in some labelled supplements. Besides this, some of these supplements also contained other spore-forming species, identified as B. cereus that are toxin producing. We have also documented a widespread use of misclassified microbial species or species with fictitious names. The main factors involved in the absence of compliance were examined and the poor quality control applied by manufacturers was emphasized.

摘要

为了评估 2005-2006 年在意大利市场上生产和销售的益生菌食品补充剂是否符合意大利关于益生元和益生菌的指南,对 29 家加工厂的 72 个样本进行了分析。该调查包括来自加工厂的 41 个样本和来自零售商的 31 个同一品牌的样本,这些样本是在不同时间间隔(3、8 和 13 个月)收集的。采用了一种基于合适分析收集方法的多相方法(总细菌的基因型鉴定-差异推测计数-活菌的基因型鉴定),以识别和定量标记和从检查的益生菌补充剂中回收的微生物。分析的大多数补充剂(87%)不符合意大利指南,差异既有定量的也有定性的(数量测定、纯度、微生物的类型和活力)。尽管大多数标记的补充剂(25 个样本)表明存在双歧杆菌双歧杆菌,但该生物仅偶尔被检测到,而且总是死细胞。在我们的调查中,由于一些标记的补充剂中凝结芽孢杆菌孢子的活力缺失,我们得到了一些意想不到的结果。除此之外,这些补充剂中还含有其他产孢子的物种,被鉴定为产毒素的蜡样芽孢杆菌。我们还记录了微生物物种的广泛错误分类或使用虚构名称的情况。研究了不遵守规定的主要因素,并强调了制造商应用的质量控制较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索