Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2010 Jan 12;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-2.
People living with a long term condition may wish to be able to plan ahead, so that if in future they cannot make decisions, their wishes about their care will be known; this process is termed Advance Care Planning (ACP). In dementia, guidance stipulates that ACP discussions should take place whilst the person still has capacity to make decisions. However there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of ACP in influencing patient choice and resource use. The aims of this study are to determine the effectiveness of ACP in dementia care, identify the factors which facilitate the process in practice and provide a better understanding of the views and experiences of key stakeholders in order to inform clinical practice.
METHODS/DESIGN: The four phase project comprises a systematic review (Phase 1) and a series of qualitative studies (Phases 2 and 3), with data collection via focus groups and individual interviews with relevant stakeholders including people with dementia and their carers, health and social care professionals and representatives from voluntary organisations and the legal profession. The conduct of the systematic review will follow current best practice guidance. In phases 2 and 3, focus groups will be employed to seek the perspectives of the professionals; individual interviews will be carried out with people with dementia and their carers. Data from Phases 1, 2 and 3 will be synthesised in a series of team workshops to develop draft guidance and educational tools for implementing ACP in practice (Phase 4).
In the UK, there is little published research on the effectiveness of ACP, despite its introduction into policy. This study was designed to explore in greater depth how ACP can best be carried out in routine practice. It affords the opportunity to develop both a theoretical and practical understanding of an area which both patients and professionals may find emotionally challenging. Importantly the study will also develop practical tools, which are grounded in practice, for all relevant stakeholders to enable the facilitation of timely and sensitive ACP discussions.
患有长期疾病的人可能希望能够提前规划,以便如果将来他们无法做出决策,他们对自己护理的意愿将被知晓;这个过程被称为预先医疗照护计划(ACP)。在痴呆症中,指南规定,在人仍然有能力做出决策时,应进行 ACP 讨论。然而,ACP 在影响患者选择和资源使用方面的有效性缺乏证据。本研究的目的是确定 ACP 在痴呆症护理中的有效性,确定在实践中促进该过程的因素,并更好地了解主要利益相关者的观点和经验,以为临床实践提供信息。
方法/设计:该四阶段项目包括系统评价(第 1 阶段)和一系列定性研究(第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段),通过焦点小组和对相关利益相关者的个人访谈收集数据,包括痴呆症患者及其照顾者、卫生和社会保健专业人员以及来自志愿组织和法律界的代表。系统评价的进行将遵循当前的最佳实践指南。在第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段,将采用焦点小组来寻求专业人员的观点;将对痴呆症患者及其照顾者进行个人访谈。第 1 阶段、第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段的数据将在一系列团队研讨会上综合,以制定用于在实践中实施 ACP 的指导草案和教育工具(第 4 阶段)。
在英国,尽管 ACP 已被纳入政策,但关于 ACP 的有效性的研究很少。本研究旨在更深入地探讨如何在常规实践中最好地进行 ACP。它为在一个可能使患者和专业人员都感到情绪挑战的领域发展理论和实践理解提供了机会。重要的是,该研究还将为所有相关利益相关者开发实用工具,这些工具基于实践,使他们能够促进及时和敏感的 ACP 讨论。