• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks.存在竞争风险时的时间依赖性预测准确性。
Biometrics. 2010 Dec;66(4):999-1011. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01375.x.
2
Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers under competing risk.评估竞争风险下生物标志物的预后准确性。
Biometrics. 2012 Jun;68(2):388-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01671.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
3
Non-parametric estimation of a time-dependent predictive accuracy curve.基于时间的预测精度曲线的非参数估计。
Biostatistics. 2013 Jan;14(1):42-59. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxs021. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
4
Quantifying and estimating the predictive accuracy for censored time-to-event data with competing risks.量化和估计具有竞争风险的删失时间事件数据的预测准确性。
Stat Med. 2018 Sep 20;37(21):3106-3124. doi: 10.1002/sim.7806. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Statistical Methods for Cohort Studies of CKD: Survival Analysis in the Setting of Competing Risks.慢性肾脏病队列研究的统计方法:竞争风险背景下的生存分析
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):1181-1189. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10301016. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
What Is the Effect of Using a Competing-risks Estimator when Predicting Survivorship After Joint Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Approaches to Survivorship Estimation in a Large Registry.在预测关节置换术后的生存率时使用竞争风险估计器的效果如何:大型登记处中生存率估计方法的比较
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Feb 1;479(2):392-403. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001533.
7
Performing Survival Analyses in the Presence of Competing Risks: A Clinical Example in Older Breast Cancer Patients.存在竞争风险时进行生存分析:老年乳腺癌患者的临床实例。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 26;108(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv366. Print 2016 May.
8
Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks.在存在删失和竞争风险的情况下,对纵向标志物和事件发生时间的联合模型的动态预测准确性进行量化和比较。
Biometrics. 2015 Mar;71(1):102-113. doi: 10.1111/biom.12232. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
9
causalCmprsk: An R package for nonparametric and Cox-based estimation of average treatment effects in competing risks data.因果风险模型:一个用于在竞争风险数据中进行非参数和 Cox 基于估计的平均治疗效果的 R 包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Dec;242:107819. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107819. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
10
Tree-based models for survival data with competing risks.基于树的竞争风险生存数据分析模型。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jun;159:185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Accounting for Competing Risks in the Assessment of Prognostic Biomarkers' Discriminative Accuracy.在评估预后生物标志物的判别准确性时考虑竞争风险
Stat Biosci. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1007/s12561-025-09499-0.
2
Development and validation of hybrid machine learning approach for predicting survival in patients with cervical cancer: a SEER-based population study.用于预测宫颈癌患者生存率的混合机器学习方法的开发与验证:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)的人群研究
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1605378. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1605378. eCollection 2025.
3
Predictive performance of risk prediction models for lung cancer incidence in Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.西方国家和亚洲国家肺癌发病风险预测模型的预测性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):4259. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83875-6.
4
Analyzing heterogeneity in biomarker discriminative performance through partial time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve modeling.通过部分时依接收器工作特征曲线建模分析生物标志物判别性能的异质性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):1424-1436. doi: 10.1177/09622802241262521. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Evaluating Dynamic Discrimination Performance of Risk Prediction Models for Survival Outcomes.评估生存结局风险预测模型的动态判别性能。
Stat Biosci. 2023 Jul;15(2):353-371. doi: 10.1007/s12561-023-09362-0. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
6
Validation of a Genetic-Enhanced Risk Prediction Model for Colorectal Cancer in a Large Community-Based Cohort.基于大型社区队列的结直肠癌遗传增强风险预测模型的验证。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Mar 6;32(3):353-362. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0817.
7
Assessing predictive discrimination performance of biomarkers in the presence of treatment-induced dependent censoring.在存在治疗引起的依存性删失的情况下评估生物标志物的预测判别性能。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2022 Nov;71(5):1137-1157. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12571. Epub 2022 May 25.
8
A Scalable Risk-Scoring System Based on Consumer-Grade Wearables for Inpatients With COVID-19: Statistical Analysis and Model Development.一种基于消费级可穿戴设备的COVID-19住院患者可扩展风险评分系统:统计分析与模型开发
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):e35717. doi: 10.2196/35717.
9
Subtle mistakes in self-report surveys predict future transition to dementia.自我报告调查中的细微错误预示着未来向痴呆症的转变。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 Dec 8;13(1):e12252. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12252. eCollection 2021.
10
Lessons learnt when accounting for competing events in the external validation of time-to-event prognostic models.在对生存预后模型进行外部验证时考虑竞争事件所得到的经验教训。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 May 9;51(2):615-625. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab256.

本文引用的文献

1
A multiparametric panel for ovarian cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy.一种用于卵巢癌诊断、预后评估及化疗反应监测的多参数检测方法。
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Dec 1;13(23):6984-92. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1409.
2
Quantifying the predictive performance of prognostic models for censored survival data with time-dependent covariates.量化具有时间依存性协变量的删失生存数据预后模型的预测性能。
Biometrics. 2008 Jun;64(2):603-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00889.x. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
3
Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.纵向标记物的前瞻性准确性。
Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00726.x.
4
Consistent estimation of the expected Brier score in general survival models with right-censored event times.在具有右删失事件时间的一般生存模型中对预期Brier评分进行一致估计。
Biom J. 2006 Dec;48(6):1029-40. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200610301.
5
Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer.70基因预后特征对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌女性患者的验证及临床应用价值
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Sep 6;98(17):1183-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj329.
6
Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.生存模型预测准确性和ROC曲线。
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):92-105. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030814.x.
7
Incidence of cardiovascular disease in older Americans: the cardiovascular health study.美国老年人心血管疾病发病率:心血管健康研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Feb;53(2):211-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53105.x.
8
Prognostic models including the Child-Pugh, MELD and Mayo risk scores--where are we and where should we go?包括Child-Pugh、MELD和梅奥风险评分在内的预后模型——我们目前的状况如何,又该何去何从?
J Hepatol. 2004 Aug;41(2):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.06.005.
9
Time-dependent ROC curves for censored survival data and a diagnostic marker.删失生存数据和诊断标志物的时间依赖性ROC曲线。
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):337-44. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00337.x.
10
Predictive accuracy and explained variation in Cox regression.Cox回归中的预测准确性和解释变异
Biometrics. 2000 Mar;56(1):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00249.x.

存在竞争风险时的时间依赖性预测准确性。

Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks.

作者信息

Saha P, Heagerty P J

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7232, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2010 Dec;66(4):999-1011. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01375.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01375.x
PMID:20070296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4512205/
Abstract

Competing risks arise naturally in time-to-event studies. In this article, we propose time-dependent accuracy measures for a marker when we have censored survival times and competing risks. Time-dependent versions of sensitivity or true positive (TP) fraction naturally correspond to consideration of either cumulative (or prevalent) cases that accrue over a fixed time period, or alternatively to incident cases that are observed among event-free subjects at any select time. Time-dependent (dynamic) specificity (1-false positive (FP)) can be based on the marker distribution among event-free subjects. We extend these definitions to incorporate cause of failure for competing risks outcomes. The proposed estimation for cause-specific cumulative TP/dynamic FP is based on the nearest neighbor estimation of bivariate distribution function of the marker and the event time. On the other hand, incident TP/dynamic FP can be estimated using a possibly nonproportional hazards Cox model for the cause-specific hazards and riskset reweighting of the marker distribution. The proposed methods extend the time-dependent predictive accuracy measures of Heagerty, Lumley, and Pepe (2000, Biometrics 56, 337-344) and Heagerty and Zheng (2005, Biometrics 61, 92-105).

摘要

竞争风险在生存时间研究中自然出现。在本文中,当我们有删失的生存时间和竞争风险时,我们提出了标记物的时间依存性准确性度量。敏感性或真阳性(TP)率的时间依存版本自然对应于对在固定时间段内累积(或现患)病例的考虑,或者对应于在任何选定时间在无事件受试者中观察到的新发病例。时间依存性(动态)特异性(1-假阳性(FP))可以基于无事件受试者中的标记物分布。我们扩展这些定义以纳入竞争风险结局的失败原因。针对特定原因的累积TP/动态FP的拟议估计基于标记物和事件时间的二元分布函数的最近邻估计。另一方面,可以使用针对特定原因风险的可能非比例风险Cox模型和标记物分布的风险集重加权来估计新发病例TP/动态FP。所提出的方法扩展了Heagerty、Lumley和Pepe(2000年,《生物统计学》56卷,337 - 344页)以及Heagerty和Zheng(2005年,《生物统计学》61卷,92 - 105页)的时间依存性预测准确性度量。