Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Apr;24(4):1109-16. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cbab6d.
This study evaluated the effects of various resistance exercise protocols on 24-hour postexercise insulin sensitivity. Seventeen participants with impaired fasting glucose (100-125 mg/dL) completed 4 separate bouts of resistance exercise under moderate intensity (65% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) or high intensity (85% 1RM) conditions within the confines of single set and multiple set protocols. Intravenous fasting blood was taken at baseline and 24 hours postexercise for each exercise condition to measure fasting plasma glucose (G0) and fasting serum insulin (I0) to calculate insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance = (G0*I0)/405). A minimum of 3 days washout was given between each exercise protocol. A 4 x 2 factorial analysis of variance was performed to compare insulin sensitivity and fasting glucose within subjects and between treatments. All of the exercise protocols improved subsequent insulin sensitivity (p = 0.002) and G0 (p = 0.001). In comparison with single set, there was a significantly greater decrease in G0 (p = 0.021) 24 hours after multiple set bouts. High intensity showed significant decreases in insulin sensitivity as compared with moderate intensity protocols (p = 0.046). Effect size data suggest a dose response relationship between program variables of volume and intensity and 24-hour postexercise insulin sensitivity. High-intensity protocols resulted in greater effect sizes for insulin sensitivity (0.83 multiple set; 0.53 single set) as compared with moderate-intensity protocols. The high-intensity, multiple set bout yielded the greatest treatment effect in both fasting glucose (0.61) and insulin sensitivity (0.83). Overall, single set protocols were less effective than multiple set protocols in lowering fasting blood glucose. Findings suggest a dose-response relationship between volume and intensity on insulin sensitivity and fasting blood glucose. Results indicate that resistance exercise is an effective treatment for acutely enhancing insulin sensitivity and regulating blood glucose in individuals with impaired fasting glucose.
这项研究评估了各种抗阻运动方案对运动后 24 小时胰岛素敏感性的影响。17 名空腹血糖受损(100-125mg/dL)的参与者在单组和多组方案的限制内,以中等强度(65%1 重复最大[1RM])或高强度(85%1RM)完成了 4 次不同的抗阻运动。在每次运动条件下,静脉空腹采血于基础和运动后 24 小时,以测量空腹血糖(G0)和空腹血清胰岛素(I0),计算胰岛素敏感性(稳态模型评估-胰岛素抵抗=(G0*I0)/405)。在每个运动方案之间至少给予 3 天的洗脱期。采用 4×2 析因方差分析比较受试者内和处理间的胰岛素敏感性和空腹血糖。所有运动方案均改善了随后的胰岛素敏感性(p=0.002)和空腹血糖(p=0.001)。与单组相比,多组后 24 小时空腹血糖(G0)显著下降(p=0.021)。与中等强度方案相比,高强度方案显示胰岛素敏感性显著降低(p=0.046)。效应量数据表明,方案变量的体积和强度与运动后 24 小时胰岛素敏感性之间存在剂量反应关系。与中等强度方案相比,高强度方案对胰岛素敏感性的效应量更大(0.83 组多;0.53 组单)。高强度、多组运动在空腹血糖(0.61)和胰岛素敏感性(0.83)方面均产生最大的治疗效果。总体而言,单组方案比多组方案更能有效降低空腹血糖。研究结果表明,体积和强度与胰岛素敏感性和空腹血糖之间存在剂量反应关系。结果表明,抗阻运动是一种有效治疗空腹血糖受损者急性增强胰岛素敏感性和调节血糖的方法。