• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以生态系统服务付费为框架的坦桑尼亚北部基于社区的自然保护。

Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in northern Tanzania.

机构信息

Maliasili Initiatives, P.O. Box 8372, Arusha, Tanzania.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):78-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01393.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01393.x
PMID:20121844
Abstract

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) are an increasingly promoted approach to conservation. These approaches seek to develop financial mechanisms that create economic incentives for the maintenance of ecosystems and associated biodiversity by rewarding those who are responsible for provision of ecological services. There are, however, few cases in which such schemes have been used as a strategy for conserving wildlife in developing countries and very few operational examples of such schemes of any sort in sub-Saharan Africa. In savannah ecosystems, large mammal populations generally depend on seasonal use of extensive areas and are widely declining as a result of habitat loss, overexploitation, and policies that limit local benefits from wildlife. Community-based conservation strategies seek to create local incentives for conserving wildlife, but often have limited impact as a result of persistent institutional barriers that limit local rights and economic benefits. In northern Tanzania, a consortium of tourism operators is attempting to address these challenges through an agreement with a village that possesses part of a key wildlife dispersal area outside Tarangire National Park. The operators pay the community to enforce voluntary restrictions on agricultural cultivation and permanent settlement in a defined area of land. The initiative represents a potentially cost-effective framework for community-based conservation in an ecologically important area and is helping to reconcile historically conflicting local and national interests relative to land tenure, pastoralist livelihoods, and conservation. Wider adaptation of payments for ecosystem services approaches to settings where sustaining wildlife populations depends on local stewardship may help address current challenges facing conservation outside state-protected areas in savannah ecosystems in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the world.

摘要

生态系统服务付费(PES)是一种日益受到推崇的保护方法。这些方法旨在通过奖励那些负责提供生态服务的人,开发出金融机制,为维护生态系统和相关生物多样性创造经济激励。然而,在发展中国家,很少有将这些计划用作保护野生动物的战略的案例,在撒哈拉以南非洲,也很少有任何形式的此类计划的运作案例。在稀树草原生态系统中,大型哺乳动物种群通常依赖于广泛地区的季节性利用,由于栖息地丧失、过度开发以及限制野生动物给当地带来利益的政策,这些种群正在广泛减少。基于社区的保护战略旨在为保护野生动物创造当地激励,但由于持久的体制障碍限制了当地权利和经济利益,往往影响有限。在坦桑尼亚北部,一个旅游经营者联盟正在通过与一个拥有塔兰吉雷国家公园外一个关键野生动物扩散区部分土地的村庄达成协议,来应对这些挑战。经营者向社区支付费用,以强制限制在指定土地范围内的农业耕种和永久性定居。这一举措代表了在一个具有生态重要性的地区,基于社区的保护的一个潜在具有成本效益的框架,有助于调和在土地保有权、牧民生计和保护方面长期存在的地方和国家利益冲突。在维持野生动物种群依赖于当地管理的情况下,更广泛地采用生态系统服务付费方法,可能有助于解决撒哈拉以南非洲和世界其他地区的国家保护区以外的保护所面临的当前挑战。

相似文献

1
Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in northern Tanzania.以生态系统服务付费为框架的坦桑尼亚北部基于社区的自然保护。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Feb;24(1):78-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01393.x.
2
Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.设计具有成本效益的保护措施支付方式,以产生时空栖息地异质性。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1475-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00829.x.
3
Local people's attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India.印度萨里斯卡老虎保护区周边当地人对保护及野生动物旅游的态度。
J Environ Manage. 2003 Dec;69(4):339-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.002.
4
Evaluating the potential for conservation development: biophysical, economic, and institutional perspectives.评估保护性开发的潜力:生物物理、经济和制度视角。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00572.x.
5
The contribution of long-term research at Gombe National Park to chimpanzee conservation.贡贝国家公园的长期研究对黑猩猩保护的贡献。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):623-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00704.x.
6
How broad-scale studies of patterns and processes can serve to guide conservation planning in Africa.关于模式和过程的大规模研究如何能够用于指导非洲的保护规划。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):659-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00706.x.
7
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.淡水生物多样性:重要性、威胁、现状及保护挑战
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):163-82. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
8
The role of research in evaluating conservation strategies in Tanzania: the case of the Katavi-Rukwa ecosystem.研究在评估坦桑尼亚保护策略中的作用:以卡塔维-鲁夸生态系统为例。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):647-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00703.x.
9
Biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services and livelihoods in tropical landscapes: towards a common agenda.生物多样性保护、生态系统服务与热带景观生计:通向共同议程。
Environ Manage. 2011 Aug;48(2):229-36. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9708-2. Epub 2011 Jun 26.
10
Linking management and livelihood in environmental conservation: case of the Korup National Park Cameroon.将环境保护中的管理与生计相联系:喀麦隆科鲁普国家公园的案例
J Environ Manage. 2005 Jul;76(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Covid-19 pandemic effects and responses in the Maasai Mara conservancy.新冠疫情对马赛马拉保护区的影响及应对措施
Tour Hosp Res. 2023 Mar 13:14673584231162275. doi: 10.1177/14673584231162275.
2
The contribution of community-based conservation models to conserving large herbivore populations.基于社区的保护模式对保护大型食草动物种群的贡献。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 13;14(1):16221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66517-9.
3
Current wildlife crime (Indian scenario): major challenges and prevention approaches.当前的野生动物犯罪(印度情况):主要挑战与预防方法。
Biodivers Conserv. 2023;32(5):1473-1491. doi: 10.1007/s10531-023-02577-z. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
Deforestation reduces fruit and vegetable consumption in rural Tanzania.森林砍伐减少了坦桑尼亚农村地区的水果和蔬菜消费量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 8;119(10):e2112063119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112063119. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Examination of tourists' willingness to pay under different conservation scenarios; Evidence from reef manta ray snorkeling in Fiji.不同保护情境下游客支付意愿研究;以斐济礁鲨潜水为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0198279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198279. eCollection 2018.
6
A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in agricultural ecological compensation.农业生态补偿的新兴趋势和新发展的科学计量学综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):16522-16532. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2160-6. Epub 2018 May 8.
7
Migratory herds of wildebeests and zebras indirectly affect calf survival of giraffes.角马和斑马的迁徙兽群间接影响长颈鹿幼崽的存活。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Oct 25;6(23):8402-8411. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2561. eCollection 2016 Dec.
8
Protected areas and poverty.保护区与贫困问题。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0271.
9
Payment for Environmental Services: Hypotheses and Evidence.环境服务付费:假设与证据
Annu Rev Resour Economics. 2013 Jun 1;5(1):139-159. doi: 10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151830.
10
Response Diversity and Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems.社会生态系统中的响应多样性与恢复力
Curr Anthropol. 2013 Apr;54(2):114-143. doi: 10.1086/669563.