Suppr超能文献

[指定医院依据《医疗治疗与监督法》接收外地住院患者时的负担]

[Burden on designated hospitals when they receive inpatients from distant places in accordance with the Medical Treatment and Supervision Act].

作者信息

Miyata Ryoji, Oguchi Yoshiyo, Fujii Yasuo, Kobayashi Yukie

机构信息

Yamanashi Prefectural Kita Hospital.

出版信息

Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2009;111(12):1485-98.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The current Medical Treatment and Supervision Act places a burden on designated psychiafric hospitals with forensic wards. We aimed to clarify the rate of discharge beyond the jurisdictional catchment area, for which overnight training becomes quite cost-ineffective, as hospital staff must accompany the patients home.

SUBJECTS

On September 30, 2008, there were 16 designated hospitals in Japan, and 447 inpatients in these hospitals. They were the subjects of this study.

METHOD

We collected information on the 447 subjects regarding the postdischarge administrative division, the nearest railway station to the postdischarge residential location, "treatment stage", "overnight training" at the postdischarge residential location, and trouble during "overnight training". We analyzed the collected data using the "designated bed sufficiency ratio". We divided the 447 subjects into three groups: (1) Home inpatient group (home group); the administrative division of his/her postdischarge residential area is the same administrative division as the designated hospital. (2) Inpatient within a jurisdiction group (within group) ; the administrative division of his/her postdischarge residential area is not the same as the designated hospital but is in any administrative division within a jurisdiction of the Japanese Regional Bureau of Health and Welfare. (3) Inpatient outside a jurisdiction group (outside group) ; the administrative division of his/her postdischarge residential area is not the same as the designated hospital but is any administrative division outside a jurisdiction of the Japanese Regional Bureau of Health and Welfare. We compared: (1) the time required to travel to the railway station nearest the postdischarge residential location (time required), (2) traveling expenses, and (3) the distance from the railway station nearest the designated hospital to that of the postdischarge residential location (distance) between the three groups. We also analyzed staff comments regarding "overnight training".

RESULTS

The lack of designated beds was a serious problem in two jurisdictions of Kinki and the Hokkaido Regional Bureau of Health and Welfare, with a "designated bed sufficient ratio" of 0.08 and 0.00, respectively. Twenty-four Japanese administrative divisions had no designated beds, while 37 administrative divisions had less than 10 inpatients at the time of the survey. The numbers of people in the "home group", "within group", and "outside group" were 125 (28.0%), 166 (37.1%), and 145 (32.4%), respectively. The "time required", traveling expenses, and distance were 1: 00, Yen 735, and 29.8 km in the "home group", 2: 51, Yen 5,764, and 165.3 km in the "within group", and 4: 14, Yen 20,565, and 694.6 km in the "outside group". Seventy-nine (59.4%) of 133 subjects who were at the "return to community stage" had already experienced "overnight training". No difference was found in the rate of "overnight training" between the "home group", "within group", and "outside group". Staff comments included difficulties in providing staff for "overnight training", responsibilities during "overnight training", and difficulties in finding places of residence in the inpatients' hometowns.

DISCUSSION

Because of the lack and maldistribution of designated beds in Japan, many patients are reluctantly admitted to designated hospitals far from their postdischarge residential areas, burdening not only hospital staff but also families and the inpatients themselves. Increasing the number of designated beds will solve this problem. An effective way would be to set up a ward with a small-scale designated unit (less than 15 beds) in the 24 administrative divisions where there are no designaed beds at present.

摘要

目的

现行的《医疗治疗与监督法》给设有法医病房的指定精神病医院带来了负担。我们旨在明确超出管辖集水区的出院率,因为对于这种情况,通宵陪护成本效益相当低,因为医院工作人员必须陪同患者回家。

对象

2008年9月30日,日本有16家指定医院,这些医院共有447名住院患者。他们是本研究的对象。

方法

我们收集了447名对象关于出院后行政区、出院后居住地点最近的火车站、“治疗阶段”、出院后居住地点的“通宵陪护”以及“通宵陪护”期间的问题等信息。我们使用“指定床位充足率”对收集到的数据进行分析。我们将447名对象分为三组:(1)家庭住院患者组(家庭组);其出院后居住地区的行政区与指定医院所在行政区相同。(2)管辖范围内住院患者组(管辖范围内组);其出院后居住地区的行政区与指定医院不同,但在日本厚生劳动省地区局管辖的任何行政区内。(3)管辖范围外住院患者组(管辖范围外组);其出院后居住地区的行政区与指定医院不同,但在日本厚生劳动省地区局管辖范围外的任何行政区。我们比较了:(1)前往出院后居住地点最近火车站所需的时间(所需时间)、(2)差旅费以及(3)指定医院最近火车站到出院后居住地点火车站的距离(距离)在三组之间的差异。我们还分析了工作人员关于“通宵陪护”的评论。

结果

在近畿和北海道厚生劳动省地区局的两个辖区,指定床位不足是一个严重问题,“指定床位充足率”分别为0.08和零。日本有24个行政区没有指定床位,而在调查时,有37个行政区的住院患者少于10人。“家庭组”、“管辖范围内组”和“管辖范围外组”的人数分别为125人(28.0%)、166人(37.1%)和145人(32.4%)。“所需时间”、差旅费和距离在“家庭组”分别为1小时、735日元和29.8公里,在“管辖范围内组”分别为2小时51分、5764日元和165.3公里,在“管辖范围外组”分别为4小时14分、20565日元和694.6公里。处于“回归社区阶段”的133名对象中有79人(59.4%)已经经历过“通宵陪护”。“家庭组”、“管辖范围内组”和“管辖范围外组”之间的“通宵陪护”率没有差异。工作人员的评论包括为“通宵陪护”提供人员困难、“通宵陪护”期间的职责以及在患者家乡寻找居住场所困难。

讨论

由于日本指定床位短缺且分布不均,许多患者无奈被收治到远离其出院后居住地区的指定医院,这不仅给医院工作人员带来负担,也给患者家庭和患者本人带来负担。增加指定床位数量将解决这个问题。一个有效的方法是在目前没有指定床位的24个行政区设立一个配备小规模指定单元(少于15张床位)的病房。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验