University of York, The York Management School, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1148-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.025. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
Teamwork has been emphasised as a key feature of health service reform, essential for safe, efficient and patient-centred care. Bringing together literatures from the sociology of healthcare and organizational theory, we examine how the teamwork phenomenon plays out in practice. Drawing upon material from two ethnographic studies, conducted in an operating theatre and a medical-records department in separate UK NHS hospitals, we explore some of the discursive teamwork practices of healthcare staff. Our analysis presents a very different picture from the normative, evangelistic promotion of teamwork within much management and health policy writing. We reveal how the ambiguity of teamwork opens up opportunities for a complex, diverse range of responses to the managerial discourse among diverse occupational groups, mobilizing the discourse to enact identity in different ways. We highlight how teamwork discourse can be instrumentally co-opted in the reproduction of the very occupational divisions it is designed to ameliorate, or simply ignored as irrelevant when compared to more attractive forms of collective identity. These responses challenge both those who believe that teamwork is a solution to problems in healthcare, as well as those concerned about the oppressive effects of pervasive managerialism.
团队合作已被强调为医疗服务改革的关键特征,对于安全、高效和以患者为中心的护理至关重要。本研究结合了医疗保健社会学和组织理论的文献,考察了团队合作现象在实践中的表现。我们借鉴了在英国两家 NHS 医院的手术室和病历部门进行的两项民族志研究的材料,探讨了医疗保健人员的一些话语团队合作实践。我们的分析与管理和卫生政策写作中对团队合作的规范性、传道式宣传形成鲜明对比。我们揭示了团队合作的模糊性如何为不同职业群体对管理话语的复杂多样的反应开辟了机会,以不同的方式利用话语来体现身份。我们强调了团队合作话语如何能够被工具性地篡夺,以复制它旨在改善的职业分工,或者当与更有吸引力的集体身份形式相比时,简单地被忽视为不相关。这些反应不仅对那些认为团队合作是解决医疗保健问题的一种方法的人构成挑战,也对普遍存在的管理主义的压迫性影响感到担忧。