Bioengineering Research Laboratory, The Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):533-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.010. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
Implant alignment in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a challenging and error-prone process using conventional techniques. Identification of the flexion-extension (FE) axis is further complicated for situations of bone loss. This study evaluated the accuracy of humeral component alignment in TEA. We hypothesized that an image-based navigation system would improve humeral component positioning, with navigational errors less than or approaching 2.0 mm and 2.0 degrees .
Implantation of a modified commercial TEA humeral component was performed with and without navigation on 11 cadaveric distal humeri. Navigated alignment was based on positioning the humeral component with the aid of a computed tomography (CT)-based preoperative plan registered to landmarks on the distal humerus. Alignment was performed under 2 scenarios of bone quality: (1) an intact distal humerus, and (2) a distal humerus without articular landmarks.
Navigation significantly improved implant alignment accuracy (P < .001). Navigated implant alignment was 1.2 +/- 0.3 mm in translation and 1.3 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees in rotation for the intact scenario. For the bone loss scenario, navigated alignment error was 1.1 +/- 0.5 mm and 2.0 degrees +/- 1.3 degrees . Non-navigated alignment was 3.1 +/- 1.3 mm and 5.0 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees for the intact scenario and 3.0 +/- 1.6 mm and 12.2 degrees +/- 3.3 degrees for the bone loss scenario.
Image-based navigation improves the accuracy and reproducibility of humeral component placement in TEA. Implant alignment errors for the navigated alignments were below the target of 2.0 degrees and 2 mm that is considered standard for most navigation systems. Non-navigated implant alignment error was significantly greater for the bone loss scenario compared with the intact scenario.
Implant malalignment may increase the likelihood of early implant wear, instability, and loosening. Improved implant positioning will likely lead to fewer complications and greater prosthesis longevity.
在全肘置换术(TEA)中,使用传统技术进行植入物的对线是一项具有挑战性且容易出错的过程。在存在骨质丢失的情况下,进一步增加了对屈伸(FE)轴进行识别的难度。本研究评估了 TEA 中肱骨组件对线的准确性。我们假设基于图像的导航系统将改善肱骨组件的定位,导航误差小于或接近 2.0 毫米和 2.0 度。
在 11 个尸体肱骨远端上进行了改良商业 TEA 肱骨组件的植入,其中包括使用和不使用导航的情况。导航对线是基于借助基于 CT 的术前计划来定位肱骨组件,该计划注册到肱骨远端的标志点。在 2 种骨质量情况下进行了对线:(1)完整的肱骨远端,和(2)无关节标志的肱骨远端。
导航显著提高了植入物的对线精度(P <.001)。在完整的情况下,导航后的植入物对线精度为 1.2 +/- 0.3 毫米的平移和 1.3 度 +/- 0.3 度的旋转。对于骨质丢失的情况,导航后的对线误差为 1.1 +/- 0.5 毫米和 2.0 度 +/- 1.3 度。在完整的情况下,非导航对线精度为 3.1 +/- 1.3 毫米和 5.0 度 +/- 3.8 度,在骨质丢失的情况下为 3.0 +/- 1.6 毫米和 12.2 度 +/- 3.3 度。
基于图像的导航提高了 TEA 中肱骨组件放置的准确性和可重复性。导航后的对线植入物对线误差低于大多数导航系统的标准,即 2.0 度和 2 毫米。与完整的情况相比,骨质丢失的情况下非导航植入物对线误差明显更大。
植入物对线不良可能会增加早期植入物磨损、不稳定和松动的可能性。改善植入物定位将可能导致更少的并发症和更长的假体寿命。