Suppr超能文献

使用新型牙本质粘结剂对复合树脂与牙本质的剪切粘结强度进行评估和比较。

An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents.

作者信息

Hegde Mithra N, Bhandary Shruti

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Deralakatte, Mangalore, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2008 Apr;11(2):71-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.44054.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of Total etch Prime and Bond NT and self etch newer dentin bonding agents Clearfil S3, Xeno III Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond and G Bond used to bond composite resin to dentin, and to compare the difference in the shear bond strengths of the self etch newer dentin bonding agents. Hundred freshly extracted noncarious human maxillary premolar teeth were selected. The occlusal surfaces of each tooth were ground to prepare flat dentin surfaces at a depth of 1.5 mm and were randomly grouped, with twenty specimens in each: Group I - Prime and Bond NT, Group II - Clearfil Protect Bond, Group III - Xeno III Bond, Group IV - Clearfil S3 Bond, Group V - G Bond. Each group was treated with its respective bonding agents, as per the manufacturers' instructions Clearfill - Kuraray, Japan, G bond - GC Tokyo, Japan, Xeno- De Trey Densply, Germany. Blocks or Cylinders of composite resin were built up using Teflon mold and cured. Shear bond strengths were tested using Instron Universal testing machine and recorded in Mpa. The results were statistically analyzed using One-way anova and Tukeys HSD test. The total etch adhesive showed higher shear bond strength than self etching adhesives (P < 0.001). Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that all the adhesive agents evaluated showed optimal shear bond strength 17-20 Mpa, except G bond. However, shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin is better with one bottle total etch adhesive than with the newer self etching bonding agents.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估全酸蚀Prime and Bond NT以及新型自酸蚀牙本质粘结剂Clearfil S3、Xeno III Bond、Clearfil Protect Bond和G Bond将复合树脂粘结至牙本质的剪切粘结强度,并比较新型自酸蚀牙本质粘结剂在剪切粘结强度上的差异。选取了100颗新鲜拔除的无龋人类上颌前磨牙。将每颗牙齿的咬合面磨平,制备出深度为1.5mm的平坦牙本质表面,并随机分组,每组20个样本:第一组——Prime and Bond NT;第二组——Clearfil Protect Bond;第三组——Xeno III Bond;第四组——Clearfil S3 Bond;第五组——G Bond。按照各自制造商(日本可乐丽公司的Clearfill、日本东京GC公司的G bond、德国德瑞·登士柏公司的Xeno)的说明,对每组样本使用相应的粘结剂进行处理。使用聚四氟乙烯模具堆积复合树脂块或圆柱体并固化。使用Instron万能试验机测试剪切粘结强度,并以兆帕为单位记录。结果采用单因素方差分析和Tukey's HSD检验进行统计学分析。全酸蚀粘结剂显示出比自酸蚀粘结剂更高的剪切粘结强度(P < 0.001)。在本体外研究的局限性范围内,可以得出结论,除G bond外,所有评估的粘结剂均显示出17 - 20兆帕的最佳剪切粘结强度。然而,复合树脂与牙本质的剪切粘结强度,一瓶装全酸蚀粘结剂比新型自酸蚀粘结剂更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6300/2813091/8ac095506795/JCD-11-71-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验