Pellicciari Leonardo, Bonetti Francesca, Di Foggia Damiano, Monesi Mauro, Vercelli Stefano
Program in Advanced Sciences and Technologies in Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Arch Physiother. 2016 Jul 22;6:9. doi: 10.1186/s40945-016-0024-2. eCollection 2016.
Patient-reported outcome measures can improve the management of patients with non-specific neck pain. The choice of measure greatly depends on its content and psychometric properties. Most questionnaires were developed for English-speaking people, and need to undergo cross-cultural validation for use in different language contexts. To help Italian clinicians select the most appropriate tool, we systematically reviewed the validated Italian-language outcome measures for non-specific neck pain, and analyzed their psychometric properties and clinical utility.
The search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. All articles published in English or Italian regarding the development, translation, or validation of patient-reported outcome measures available in the Italian language were included. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist.
Out of 4891articles screened, 66 were eligible. Overall, they were of poor or fair methodological quality. Four instruments measuring function and disability (Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire, and Core Outcome Measures Index), and one measuring activity-related fear of movement (NeckPix©) were identified. Each scale showed some psychometric weaknesses or problems with functioning, and none emerged as a gold standard.
Several patient-reported outcome measures are now available for assessing Italian people with non-specific neck pain. While the Neck Disability Index is the one most widely used, the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire appears the most promising tool from a psychometric point of view.
患者报告的结局指标可改善非特异性颈部疼痛患者的管理。指标的选择很大程度上取决于其内容和心理测量特性。大多数问卷是为英语使用者开发的,在不同语言环境中使用需要进行跨文化验证。为帮助意大利临床医生选择最合适的工具,我们系统回顾了已验证的用于非特异性颈部疼痛的意大利语结局指标,并分析了它们的心理测量特性和临床效用。
在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行检索。纳入所有以英语或意大利语发表的关于意大利语患者报告结局指标的开发、翻译或验证的文章。两名审阅者独立选择研究、提取数据,并使用COSMIN清单评估方法学质量。
在筛选的4891篇文章中,66篇符合条件。总体而言,它们的方法学质量较差或一般。确定了四项测量功能和残疾的工具(颈部残疾指数、颈部疼痛和残疾量表、颈部伯恩茅斯问卷和核心结局指标指数),以及一项测量与活动相关的运动恐惧的工具(NeckPix©)。每个量表都显示出一些心理测量弱点或功能问题,没有一个成为金标准。
现在有几种患者报告的结局指标可用于评估患有非特异性颈部疼痛的意大利人。虽然颈部残疾指数是使用最广泛的指标,但从心理测量角度来看,颈部伯恩茅斯问卷似乎是最有前途的工具。