Simonato L, Fletcher A C, Andersen A, Anderson K, Becker N, Chang-Claude J, Ferro G, Gérin M, Gray C N, Hansen K S
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Br J Ind Med. 1991 Mar;48(3):145-54. doi: 10.1136/oem.48.3.145.
A multicentre cohort of 11,092 male welders from 135 companies located in nine European countries has been assembled with the aim of investigating the relation of potential cancer risk, lung cancer in particular, with occupational exposure. The observation period and the criteria for inclusion of welders varied from country to country. Follow up was successful for 96.9% of the cohort and observed numbers of deaths (and for some countries incident cancer cases) were compared with expected numbers calculated from national reference rates. Mortality and cancer incidence ratios were analysed by cause category, time since first exposure, duration of employment, and estimated cumulative dose to total fumes, chromium (Cr), Cr VI, and nickel (Ni). Overall a statistically significant excess was reported for mortality from lung cancer (116 observed v 86.81 expected deaths, SMR = 134). When analysed by type of welding an increasing pattern with time since first exposure was present for both mild steel and stainless steel welders, which was more noticeable for the subcohort of predominantly stainless steel welders. No clear relation was apparent between mortality from lung cancer and duration of exposure to or estimated cumulative dose of Ni or Cr. Whereas the patterns of lung cancer mortality in these results suggest that the risk of lung cancer is higher for stainless steel than mild steel welders the different level of risk for these two categories of welding exposure cannot be quantified with precision. The report of five deaths from pleural mesothelioma unrelated to the type of welding draws attention to the risk of exposure to asbestos in welding activities.
来自9个欧洲国家135家公司的11092名男性焊工组成了一个多中心队列,旨在研究潜在癌症风险,特别是肺癌与职业暴露之间的关系。各国焊工的观察期和纳入标准各不相同。该队列96.9%的随访成功,并将观察到的死亡人数(以及部分国家的新发癌症病例数)与根据国家参考率计算出的预期人数进行了比较。通过死因类别、首次暴露后的时间、就业时长以及估计的总烟雾、铬(Cr)、六价铬(Cr VI)和镍(Ni)的累积剂量,分析了死亡率和癌症发病率比值。总体而言,报告显示肺癌死亡率存在统计学上的显著超额(观察到116例死亡,预期86.81例,标准化死亡比=134)。按焊接类型分析时,低碳钢和不锈钢焊工首次暴露后的时间都呈现出上升趋势,这在主要为不锈钢焊工的亚组中更为明显。肺癌死亡率与镍或铬的暴露时长或估计累积剂量之间没有明显关系。尽管这些结果中肺癌死亡率的模式表明不锈钢焊工患肺癌的风险高于低碳钢焊工,但这两类焊接暴露的不同风险水平无法精确量化。报告了5例与焊接类型无关的胸膜间皮瘤死亡病例,这引起了人们对焊接活动中石棉暴露风险的关注。