• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居住偏好与邻里种族隔离:对谢林隔离模型的检验

Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model.

作者信息

Clark W A

机构信息

Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.

出版信息

Demography. 1991 Feb;28(1):1-19.

PMID:2015937
Abstract

The debate over the role of the forces that create the patterns of residential separation has identified neighborhood preferences as one of the explanatory variables, but although we possess some empirical data on the nature of neighborhood racial preferences, the theoretical contributions have received only limited empirical evaluation. Among the theoretical statements, Schelling's model of the effects of small differences in preferences on residential patterns has provided a basic building block in our understanding of preferences, choices, and patterns. Several recent surveys of residential preferences provide the data with which to evaluate the underpinnings of the Schelling model. The preference/tolerance schedules that are derived from the data have a different functional form from that suggested by Schelling, but confirm the view that stable integrated equilibria are unlikely.

摘要

关于造成居住隔离模式的各种力量所起作用的争论,已将邻里偏好确定为解释变量之一。然而,尽管我们掌握了一些关于邻里种族偏好性质的实证数据,但这些理论贡献仅得到了有限的实证评估。在这些理论阐述中,谢林关于偏好上的微小差异对居住模式影响的模型,为我们理解偏好、选择和模式提供了一个基本框架。最近的几项居住偏好调查提供了用于评估谢林模型基础的数据。从这些数据得出的偏好/容忍度表,其函数形式与谢林所提出的不同,但证实了稳定的融合均衡不太可能出现的观点。

相似文献

1
Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model.居住偏好与邻里种族隔离:对谢林隔离模型的检验
Demography. 1991 Feb;28(1):1-19.
2
How low can it go? Declining black-white segregation in a multiethnic context.它能降到多低?多民族背景下黑人和白人之间的隔离现象在减少。
Demography. 1999 Feb;36(1):93-109.
3
Race and space in the 1990s: changes in the geographic scale of racial residential segregation, 1990-2000.20世纪90年代的种族与空间:1990 - 2000年种族居住隔离地理范围的变化
Soc Sci Res. 2009 Mar;38(1):55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.10.002.
4
Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment.在邻里偏好中,种族重要吗?一项视频实验的结果。
AJS. 2009 Sep;115(2):527-59. doi: 10.1086/599248.
5
The determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: racial proxy revisited.邻里满意度的决定因素:重新审视种族代理。
Demography. 2011 Aug;48(3):1203-29. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0047-y.
6
Racial Differences in Neighborhood Attainment: The Contributions of Interneighborhood Migration and In Situ Change.邻里获得方面的种族差异:邻里间迁移和原地变化的贡献。
Demography. 2017 Oct;54(5):1819-1843. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0606-y.
7
Kin location and racial disparities in exiting and entering poor neighborhoods.迁居位置与进出贫困社区的种族差异。
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Nov;84:102346. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102346. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
8
Intergenerational Neighborhood Attainment and the Legacy of Racial Residential Segregation: A Causal Mediation Analysis.代际邻里成就与种族居住隔离的遗留影响:因果中介分析
Demography. 2017 Aug;54(4):1221-1250. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0597-8.
9
Shifting racial hierarchies: An analysis of residential segregation among multi-racial and mono-racial groups in the United States.种族等级制度的转变:对美国多种族和单一种族群体居住隔离情况的分析
Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Mar;71(1):83-99. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2016.1254813. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
10
Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context.多民族背景下的居住偏好与居住选择
Demography. 1992 Aug;29(3):451-66.

引用本文的文献

1
Partner choice and cooperation in social dilemmas can increase resource inequality.在社会困境中,合作对象的选择和合作行为可能会加剧资源不平等。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 13;14(1):6432. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42128-2.
2
Aging effects in Schelling segregation model.谢林隔离模型中的老龄化效应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 12;12(1):19376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23224-7.
3
Coethnic Concentration and Asians' Perceived Discrimination across U.S. Counties during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间美国各县的同族聚居情况与亚裔所感受到的歧视

本文引用的文献

1
The Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography: urban restructuring from a demographic perspective.罗普克经济地理学讲座:从人口统计学视角看城市重构
Econ Geogr. 1987 Apr;63(2):103-25.
2
Mover destination selectivity and the changing suburbanization of metropolitan whites and blacks.迁移目的地选择性与大都市白人和黑人郊区化的变化
Demography. 1985 May;22(2):223-43.
3
Hypersegregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: black and Hispanic segregation along five dimensions.美国大都市区的高度隔离:黑人和西班牙裔在五个维度上的隔离
Socius. 2022 Sep 26;8:23780231221124580. doi: 10.1177/23780231221124580. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
If you move, I move: The social influence effect on residential mobility.随大流:社会影响对居住迁移的作用。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0270783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270783. eCollection 2022.
5
A complex systems perspective of news recommender systems: Guiding emergent outcomes with feedback models.新闻推荐系统的复杂系统视角:利用反馈模型引导涌现结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0245096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245096. eCollection 2021.
6
A geospatial agent-based model of the spatial urban dynamics of immigrant population: A study of the island of Montreal, Canada.基于时空Agent 的移民人口空间城市动态模型:以加拿大蒙特利尔岛为例
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 24;14(7):e0219188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219188. eCollection 2019.
7
Remaking White Residential Segregation: Metropolitan Diversity and Neighborhood Change in the United States.重塑白人居住隔离:美国大都市的多样性与社区变迁
Urban Geogr. 2018;39(4):519-545. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2017.1360039. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Ethnic differences in realising desires to leave urban neighbourhoods.实现离开城市社区愿望方面的种族差异。
J Hous Built Environ. 2017;32(3):495-512. doi: 10.1007/s10901-016-9524-3. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
9
Three Dimensions of Change in School Segregation: A Grade-Period-Cohort Analysis.学校隔离的三个维度变化:年级-时期-队列分析。
Demography. 2018 Feb;55(1):33-58. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0632-9.
10
The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants' residential environments.一项住房流动性实验对参与者居住环境的影响。
Hous Policy Debate. 2017;27(3):419-448. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
Demography. 1989 Aug;26(3):373-91.