Suppr超能文献

中年后期的认知与冠心病发病:白厅II研究

Cognition and incident coronary heart disease in late midlife: The Whitehall II study.

作者信息

Singh-Manoux Archana, Sabia Séverine, Kivimaki Mika, Shipley Martin J, Ferrie Jane E, Marmot Michael G

机构信息

INSERM U687-IFR69, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Bât 15/16, 16 avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France.

出版信息

Intelligence. 2009 Nov 1;37(6):529-534. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.12.001.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cognitive function in midlife predicts incident coronary heart disease (CHD), followed up over 6 years. Data on 5292 (28% women, mean age 55) individuals free from CHD at baseline were drawn from the British Whitehall II study. We used Cox regression to model the association between cognition and CHD in analyses adjusted for socio-demographic variables, cardiovascular risk factors and health behaviors. The results show a one standard deviation lower score on the "general" cognitive measure and measures of reasoning and vocabulary to be associated with elevated CHD risk. There was some evidence that these effects differed between high and low socioeconomic status (SES) groups with associations only seen in the low SES group. These results were not explained by threshold effects or by the different SES groups representing different parts of the cognitive test score distribution. Three other possible explanations of these results are discussed: sub clinical vascular disease drives the observed association but no effect is observed in the high SES group due to compensation provided by greater cognitive reserve, cognition is a marker of overall bodily integrity particularly in low-SES groups, and SES is a moderator of the association between cognition and CHD, because it marks a range of other risk factors.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查中年时期的认知功能是否能预测6年随访期间冠心病(CHD)的发病情况。基线时无冠心病的5292名个体(28%为女性,平均年龄55岁)的数据来自英国白厅II研究。在对社会人口统计学变量、心血管危险因素和健康行为进行调整的分析中,我们使用Cox回归对认知与冠心病之间的关联进行建模。结果显示,在“一般”认知测量以及推理和词汇测量中,得分每降低一个标准差,冠心病风险就会升高。有证据表明,这些影响在高社会经济地位(SES)组和低社会经济地位组之间存在差异,仅在低社会经济地位组中观察到关联。这些结果无法用阈值效应或代表认知测试分数分布不同部分的不同社会经济地位组来解释。本文讨论了这些结果的其他三种可能解释:亚临床血管疾病导致了观察到的关联,但由于较高的认知储备提供了补偿,在高社会经济地位组中未观察到影响;认知是整体身体完整性的标志,尤其是在低社会经济地位组中;社会经济地位是认知与冠心病之间关联的调节因素,因为它标志着一系列其他风险因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Cognitive epidemiology.认知流行病学
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 May;61(5):378-84. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.039206.
7
Heart disease and dementia: a population-based study.心脏病与痴呆症:一项基于人群的研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Jan 15;163(2):135-41. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj025. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
9
Cohort Profile: the Whitehall II study.队列简介:白厅II研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;34(2):251-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh372. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
10
Mild cognitive impairment.轻度认知障碍
Curr Opin Neurol. 2002 Aug;15(4):401-7. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200208000-00001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验