Krieger N
Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA 94611.
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Oct;39(7):887-903. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90202-x.
'Multiple causation' is the canon of contemporary epidemiology, and its metaphor and model is the 'web of causation.' First articulated in a 1960 U.S. epidemiology textbook, the 'web' remains a widely accepted but poorly elaborated model, reflecting in part the contemporary stress on epidemiologic methods over epidemiologic theories of disease causation. This essay discusses the origins, features, and problems of the 'web,' including its hidden reliance upon the framework of biomedical individualism to guide the choice of factors incorporated in the 'web.' Posing the question of the whereabouts of the putative 'spider,' the author examines several contemporary approaches to epidemiologic theory, including those which stress biological evolution and adaptation and those which emphasize the social production of disease. To better integrate biologic and social understandings of current and changing population patterns of health and disease, the essay proposes an ecosocial framework for developing epidemiologic theory. Features of this alternative approach are discussed, a preliminary image is offered, and debate is encouraged.
“多重病因”是当代流行病学的准则,其隐喻和模型是“病因网”。“病因网”最早在1960年美国的一本流行病学教科书中提出,至今仍是一个被广泛接受但阐述不足的模型,这在一定程度上反映了当代对流行病学方法的重视超过了对疾病病因的流行病学理论的重视。本文讨论了“病因网”的起源、特点和问题,包括其对生物医学个人主义框架的隐性依赖,该框架指导了“病因网”中纳入因素的选择。作者提出了假定的“蜘蛛”在哪里的问题,研究了几种当代流行病学理论方法,包括强调生物进化和适应的方法以及强调疾病社会成因的方法。为了更好地整合对当前和不断变化的人群健康与疾病模式的生物学和社会学理解,本文提出了一个用于发展流行病学理论的生态社会框架。讨论了这种替代方法的特点,给出了一个初步设想,并鼓励进行辩论。