CosmORAL Oral and Dental Health Polyclinics, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1015-32.
To evaluate correlations between Periotest, cutting torque or insertion torque, and/or the reverse torque test with resonance frequency analysis measurements.
The combined search terms dental implant, primary stability, resonance frequency analysis, removal torque, vibration analysis, torque, Periotest, cutting torque, and insertion torque and specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to retrieve eligible articles published between 1998 and 2008 (up to April 1) from PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, The Cochrane Library databases, and 10 journals by hand-searching. The pooled P value was calculated with the Fisher method. The correlation coefficients (r) were combined using fixed and random effect models. Heterogeneity of the studies was tested by performing the homogeneity test.
Fifty articles were identified, but 3 studies were excluded because of limitations in study design. Studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria fell into a variety of categories (11 human cadaver, 16 clinical, 15 animal, and 5 in vitro studies). Assessment of P values revealed that correlation between cutting torque or insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis was significant (6 studies; P = .0022). Correlation between Periotest and cutting torque or insertion torque was significant (1 study; P = .015), and correlations between resonance frequency analysis and reverse torque test values (1 study; P = .319; r = 0.405) and Periotest and resonance frequency analysis (P = .28) were insignificant. Nine articles provided r values, and cutting torque or insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis showed a statistically significant and direct relationship of 55.4% (P = .000). One study provided an r value of -0.149. A statistically significant and direct relationship of 87.6% was found between cutting torque or insertion torque and reverse torque (2 studies; P = .000).
This meta-analysis of 47 studies showed a statistically significant correlation between cutting torque or insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis.
评估 Periotest、切割扭矩或插入扭矩和/或反向扭矩测试与共振频率分析测量之间的相关性。
使用组合搜索词“牙种植体、初始稳定性、共振频率分析、去除扭矩、振动分析、扭矩、Periotest、切割扭矩、插入扭矩”以及特定的纳入和排除标准,从 PubMed、EMBASE、OVID、The Cochrane Library 数据库和 10 种期刊中手动搜索,检索 1998 年至 2008 年(截至 4 月 1 日)发表的合格文章。使用 Fisher 法计算合并的 P 值。使用固定和随机效应模型合并相关系数(r)。通过进行同质性检验测试研究的异质性。
确定了 50 篇文章,但由于研究设计的限制,排除了 3 项研究。符合纳入标准的研究分为多种类别(11 项人体尸体研究、16 项临床研究、15 项动物研究和 5 项体外研究)。评估 P 值表明,切割扭矩或插入扭矩与共振频率分析之间的相关性具有统计学意义(6 项研究;P =.0022)。Periotest 与切割扭矩或插入扭矩之间的相关性具有统计学意义(1 项研究;P =.015),而共振频率分析与反向扭矩测试值(1 项研究;P =.319;r = 0.405)和 Periotest 与共振频率分析(P =.28)之间的相关性无统计学意义。9 篇文章提供了 r 值,切割扭矩或插入扭矩与共振频率分析显示出具有统计学意义的直接关系,为 55.4%(P =.000)。1 项研究提供了 r 值-0.149。切割扭矩或插入扭矩与反向扭矩(2 项研究;P =.000)之间存在具有统计学意义的直接关系,为 87.6%。
本荟萃分析纳入了 47 项研究,结果显示切割扭矩或插入扭矩与共振频率分析之间存在统计学显著相关性。