Eating Disorders Section, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, University of London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Eat Weight Disord. 2009 Dec;14(4):e243-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03325125.
To validate the online questionnaire form of the Eating Disorders Examination (EDE-Q) against the interview version (EDE) in a clinic and community sample of adolescents with bulimia nervosa (BN) or atypical BN (eating disorder not otherwise specified with bulimic features - EDNOS-BN).
Adolescents with BN (N=58) or EDNOS-BN (N=37) completed the EDE over the telephone and the EDE-Q online.
There were moderate to high correlations between the attitudinal scales. Eating was rated as more pathological on the EDE-Q than the EDE, except dietary restraint. As in research among adults, agreement between the two measures was low regarding binge eating episodes, but better for vomiting episodes. When compared with the EDE, the EDE-Q attitudinal scales were more valid for BN than for EDNOS-BN patients, and more valid for the clinic sample.
The online version of the EDE-Q has partial validity for use with adolescents. The EDE-Q might be reporting a more accurate description of current status, as it avoids possible filtering and approval aspects.
在诊所和社区青少年神经性贪食症（BN）或非典型 BN（伴有贪食特征的未特定饮食障碍 - EDNOS-BN）样本中，验证饮食障碍问卷（EDE-Q）的在线问卷形式与访谈版本（EDE）的有效性。
BN（N=58）或 EDNOS-BN（N=37）的青少年通过电话完成 EDE 和在线 EDE-Q。
态度量表之间存在中度到高度相关性。与 EDE 相比，EDE-Q 对饮食的评价更为病态，除了饮食抑制。与成人研究一样，两种方法在暴食发作方面的一致性较低，但在呕吐发作方面较好。与 EDE 相比，EDE-Q 的态度量表在 BN 患者中比 EDNOS-BN 患者更有效，在诊所样本中也更有效。
EDE-Q 的在线版本对青少年使用具有部分有效性。EDE-Q 可能报告了更准确的当前状态描述，因为它避免了可能的过滤和认可方面。
