• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PRISMA:泛欧协调行动,旨在推进临终癌症关怀领域的科学研究。

PRISMA: a pan-European co-ordinating action to advance the science in end-of-life cancer care.

机构信息

King's College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine at Guy's King's and St. Thomas Hospitals, Cicely Saunders Institute, Bessemer Road, London SE5 9PJ, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jun;46(9):1493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.035. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.035
PMID:20185295
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology of progressive cancer and associated mortality in Europe underlines the essential need for high quality palliative and end-of-life care for its citizens. Currently, care of patients at the end-of-life is under-researched and under-funded. This is due to a lack of prioritisation, challenges in defining end-of-life, lack of a common research strategy for Europe that identifies and implements best practice and highest scientific principles, and the need for common use of appropriate well-validated tools to measure and improve the end-of-life cancer experience in Europe.

METHODS

PRISMA is a pan-European co-ordinating action funded under Framework Programme 7 of the European Commission. With 12 partners in 9 countries, it is delivering a series of 8 Work Packages with the common aim of promoting best practice in the measurement of end-of-life care, setting an agenda and guidance that reflects European cultural diversity, and is informed by both public and clinical priorities. Guidance in the selection, adaptation and use of core tools is informed by experts in public health and clinical research.

DISCUSSION

PRISMA is currently producing a series of outputs to be accessible to the wider community of researchers, policy makers, funders and clinicians. We encourage new partnerships to build on the work of PRISMA and to lead high quality work informed by our deliverables. PRISMA, we hope, is redressing the current lack of co-ordination of cancer end-of-life research across Europe, and will catalyse the conduct of evidence-based care that reflects European populations and priorities.

摘要

简介

欧洲进行性癌症及其相关死亡率的流行病学研究强调了为其公民提供高质量姑息治疗和临终关怀的必要性。目前,临终关怀患者的护理研究不足,资金不足。这是由于缺乏优先事项、定义临终关怀的挑战、缺乏针对欧洲的共同研究策略,以确定和实施最佳实践和最高科学原则,以及需要共同使用适当的、经过良好验证的工具来衡量和改善欧洲的临终癌症体验。

方法

PRISMA 是欧洲委员会第七个框架计划资助的泛欧协调行动。该项目有 9 个国家的 12 个合作伙伴,正在开展一系列 8 个工作包,其共同目标是促进临终关怀测量的最佳实践,制定反映欧洲文化多样性的议程和指导方针,并由公共和临床优先事项提供信息。公共卫生和临床研究专家为核心工具的选择、调整和使用提供指导。

讨论

PRISMA 目前正在制作一系列可供更广泛的研究人员、政策制定者、资助者和临床医生使用的产出。我们鼓励建立新的伙伴关系,以 PRISMA 的工作为基础,并根据我们的交付成果开展高质量的工作。我们希望 PRISMA 能够纠正当前欧洲癌症临终关怀研究协调不足的问题,并促进基于证据的护理,反映欧洲人口和优先事项。

相似文献

1
PRISMA: a pan-European co-ordinating action to advance the science in end-of-life cancer care.PRISMA:泛欧协调行动,旨在推进临终癌症关怀领域的科学研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jun;46(9):1493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.035. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
2
The PRISMA Symposium 4: how should Europe progress end-of-life and palliative clinical care research? Recommendations from the proceedings.PRISMA 研讨会 4:欧洲应如何推进临终和姑息治疗临床研究?会议记录的建议。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Oct;42(4):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.006.
3
Clinical priorities, barriers and solutions in end-of-life cancer care research across Europe. Report from a workshop.欧洲终末期癌症关怀研究的临床重点、障碍和解决方案。研讨会报告。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jul;46(10):1815-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
4
The PRISMA Symposium 1: outcome tool use. Disharmony in European outcomes research for palliative and advanced disease care: too many tools in practice.PRISMA 研讨会 1:结局工具的使用。在姑息治疗和晚期疾病护理的欧洲结局研究中存在不和谐:实践中使用了太多的工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Oct;42(4):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.008.
5
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
6
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
7
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
8
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
9
Republished: which questions of two commonly used multidimensional palliative care patient reported outcome measures are most useful? Results from the European and African PRISMA survey.再发表:两种常用多维姑息治疗患者报告结局测量工具的哪些问题最有用?来自欧洲和非洲 PRISMA 调查的结果。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Aug;88(1042):451-7. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-000061rep.
10
Series: The research agenda for general practice/family medicine and primary health care in Europe. Part 2. Results: Primary care management and community orientation.系列:欧洲全科医学/家庭医学和初级卫生保健的研究议程。第 2 部分。结果:初级保健管理和社区定位。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2010 Mar;16(1):42-50. doi: 10.3109/13814780903563725.

引用本文的文献

1
The state of global palliative care research: a bibliometric study.全球姑息治疗研究现状:一项文献计量学研究
Ecancermedicalscience. 2025 Jul 10;19:1943. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2025.1943. eCollection 2025.
2
A novel child-centred core palliative care outcome measure for use in clinical practice and research: findings from a multinational validation study.一种用于临床实践和研究的新型以儿童为中心的核心姑息治疗结局指标:一项多国验证研究的结果
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 21;23(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02346-2.
3
A core outcome set for best care for the dying person: Results of an international Delphi study and consensus meeting.
针对临终患者最佳照护的核心结局集:一项国际德尔菲研究与共识会议的结果
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):163-175. doi: 10.1177/02692163241300867. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
4
Place of care and death preferences among recently bereaved family members: a cross-sectional survey.近期丧亲家庭成员的护理地点与死亡偏好:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2904-e2913. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004697.
5
Public health palliative care interventions that enable communities to support people who are dying and their carers: a scoping review of studies that assess person-centered outcomes.促进社区支持临终者及其照护者的公共卫生姑息治疗干预措施:评估以患者为中心的结局的研究的范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;11:1180571. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180571. eCollection 2023.
6
Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers.早期姑息治疗干预对改善原发性脑恶性肿瘤患者及其照护者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013440.pub2.
7
Successful Strategies and Areas of Improvement-Lessons Learned from Design and Conduction of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial in Palliative Care, 'Palliative-D'.成功策略与改进领域——从姑息治疗随机安慰剂对照试验“Palliative-D”的设计与实施中吸取的经验教训
Life (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;11(11):1233. doi: 10.3390/life11111233.
8
The needs, models of care, interventions and outcomes of palliative care in the Caribbean: a systematic review of the evidence.加勒比地区姑息治疗的需求、护理模式、干预措施及结果:证据的系统综述
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 22;15:9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0079-6.
9
Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries.将养老院选为最不愿离世的场所:一项对七个欧洲国家公众偏好的跨国调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Oct 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-48.
10
Public preferences and priorities for end-of-life care in Kenya: a population-based street survey.肯尼亚生命终末期照护的公众偏好和优先事项:基于人群的街头调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Feb 15;13(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-4.