Suppr超能文献

训练分期的方法论和生理学的新视野。

New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization.

机构信息

Elite Sport Department, Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2010 Mar 1;40(3):189-206. doi: 10.2165/11319770-000000000-00000.

Abstract

The theory of training was established about five decades ago when knowledge of athletes' preparation was far from complete and the biological background was based on a relatively small amount of objective research findings. At that time, traditional 'training periodization', a division of the entire seasonal programme into smaller periods and training units, was proposed and elucidated. Since then, international sport and sport science have experienced tremendous changes, while the traditional training periodization has remained at more or less the same level as the published studies of the initial publications. As one of the most practically oriented components of theory, training periodization is intended to offer coaches basic guidelines for structuring and planning training. However, during recent decades contradictions between the traditional model of periodization and the demands of high-performance sport practice have inevitably developed. The main limitations of traditional periodization stemmed from: (i) conflicting physiological responses produced by 'mixed' training directed at many athletic abilities; (ii) excessive fatigue elicited by prolonged periods of multi-targeted training; (iii) insufficient training stimulation induced by workloads of medium and low concentration typical of 'mixed' training; and (iv) the inability to provide multi-peak performances over the season. The attempts to overcome these limitations led to development of alternative periodization concepts. The recently developed block periodization model offers an alternative revamped approach for planning the training of high-performance athletes. Its general idea proposes the sequencing of specialized training cycles, i.e. blocks, which contain highly concentrated workloads directed to a minimal number of targeted abilities. Unlike the traditional model, in which the simultaneous development of many athletic abilities predominates, block-periodized training presupposes the consecutive development of reasonably selected target abilities. The content of block-periodized training is set down in its general principles, a taxonomy of mesocycle blocks, and guidelines for compiling an annual plan.

摘要

训练理论大约在五十年前建立,当时运动员准备情况的知识远不完善,生物学背景基于相对较少的客观研究发现。当时,提出并阐述了传统的“训练分期”,即将整个赛季计划划分为较小的周期和训练单元。从那时起,国际体育和运动科学经历了巨大的变化,而传统的训练分期在某种程度上保持着与最初出版物的发表研究相同的水平。作为理论中最具实践导向的组成部分之一,训练分期旨在为教练提供结构化和计划训练的基本指导方针。然而,在最近几十年中,传统分期模式与高绩效运动实践的需求之间不可避免地出现了矛盾。传统分期的主要局限性源于:(i)针对多种运动能力的“混合”训练所产生的冲突的生理反应;(ii)长时间多目标训练引起的过度疲劳;(iii)“混合”训练中典型的中低浓度工作量引起的训练刺激不足;以及(iv)无法在整个赛季中提供多峰表现。为克服这些局限性而进行的尝试导致了替代分期概念的发展。最近开发的块状分期模型为规划高水平运动员的训练提供了一种替代的改进方法。其总体思路提出了专门训练周期(即块)的序列,其中包含高度集中的工作量,针对少数目标能力。与传统模式不同,传统模式中多个运动能力的同时发展占主导地位,块状分期训练假设合理选择的目标能力的连续发展。块状分期训练的内容规定在其一般原则、中周期块分类法和编制年度计划的指导方针中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验