Suppr超能文献

关系推理是否依赖于语言?基于体素的病变症状映射研究。

Is relational reasoning dependent on language? A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study.

机构信息

Center for Aphasia and Related Disorders, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, California, United States.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2010 May;113(2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Mar 5.

Abstract

Previous studies with brain-injured patients have suggested that language abilities are necessary for complex problem-solving, even when tasks are non-verbal. In the current study, we tested this notion by analyzing behavioral and neuroimaging data from a large group of left-hemisphere stroke patients (n=107) suffering from a range of language impairment from none to severe. Patients were tested on the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), a non-verbal test of reasoning that requires participants to complete a visual pattern or sequence with one of six possible choices. For some items, the solution could be determined by visual pattern-matching, but other items required more complex, relational reasoning. As predicted, performance on the relational-reasoning items was disproportionately affected in language-impaired patients with aphasia, relative to non-aphasic, left-hemisphere patients. A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) procedure was used to relate patients' RCPM performance with areas of damage in the brain. Results showed that deficits on the relational reasoning problems were associated with lesions in the left middle and superior temporal gyri, regions essential for language processing, as well as in the left inferior parietal lobule. In contrast, the visual pattern-matching condition was associated with lesions in posterior portions of the left hemisphere that subserve visual processing, namely, occipital and inferotemporal cortex. These findings provide compelling support for the idea that language is critical for higher-level reasoning and problem-solving.

摘要

先前对脑损伤患者的研究表明,语言能力对于复杂问题的解决是必要的,即使任务是非语言的。在当前的研究中,我们通过分析一组来自大量左半球中风患者(n=107)的行为和神经影像学数据来检验这一观点,这些患者的语言障碍程度从无到严重不等。患者接受了瑞文彩色渐进矩阵测验(RCPM)的测试,这是一种非语言推理测试,要求参与者用六个可能的选择之一完成一个视觉模式或序列。对于一些项目,解决方案可以通过视觉模式匹配来确定,但其他项目需要更复杂的关系推理。正如预测的那样,在有失语症的语言障碍患者中,关系推理项目的表现相对于非失语症的左半球患者受到不成比例的影响。使用基于体素的病变症状映射(VLSM)程序将患者的 RCPM 表现与大脑损伤区域相关联。结果表明,关系推理问题的缺陷与左中颞叶和左顶叶下小叶的损伤有关,这些区域对语言处理至关重要。相比之下,视觉模式匹配条件与左半球后部的损伤有关,这些损伤负责视觉处理,即枕叶和下颞叶皮质。这些发现为语言对于高级推理和问题解决至关重要的观点提供了有力的支持。

相似文献

4
Transient aphasias after left hemisphere resective surgery.左半球切除术后的短暂性失语症
J Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;123(3):581-93. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS141962. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
6
Voxel-based lesion analysis of brain regions underlying reading and writing.基于体素的阅读和书写相关脑区病变分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 1;115:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

3
The language network is not engaged in object categorization.语言网络不参与物体分类。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Sep 26;33(19):10380-10400. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad289.
4
Semantic and Visuospatial Fluid Reasoning in School-Aged Autistic Children.学龄期自闭症儿童的语义和视空间流体推理能力。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Dec;53(12):4719-4730. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05746-1. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
3
Neurocognitive development of relational reasoning.关系推理的神经认知发展
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):55-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00743.x.
5
Power in Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.基于体素的病损-症状映射中的效能
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1067-80. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1067.
6
Is problem solving dependent on language?解决问题是否依赖于语言?
Brain Lang. 2005 Mar;92(3):240-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.103.
10
The cognitive functions of language.语言的认知功能。
Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Dec;25(6):657-74; discussion 674-725. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x02000122.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验