Suppr超能文献

急性严重脑损伤患者的早期与晚期气管切开术。

Early versus late tracheostomy in patients with acute severe brain injury.

机构信息

Federal University of Juiz de Fora - Juiz de Fora, Brazil.

出版信息

J Bras Pneumol. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):84-91. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132010000100014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of early tracheostomy and of late tracheostomy in patients with acute severe brain injury.

METHODS

A retrospective study involving 28 patients admitted to the ICU of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora University Hospital in Juiz de Fora, Brazil, diagnosed with acute severe brain injury and presenting with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score < 8 within the first 48 h of hospitalization. The patients were divided into two groups: early tracheostomy (ET), performed within the first 8 days after admission; and late tracheostomy (LT), performed after postadmission day 8. At admission, we collected demographic data and determined the following scores: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, GCS and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups (ET vs. LT) regarding the demographic data or the scores: APACHE II (26 +/- 6 vs. 28 +/- 8; p = 0.37), SOFA (6.3 +/- 2.7 vs. 7.2 +/- 3.0; p = 0.43) and GCS (5.4 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.7; p = 0.87). The 28-day mortality rate was lower in the ET group (9% vs. 47%; p = 0.04). Nosocomial pneumonia occurring within the first 7 days was less common in the ET group, although the difference was not significant (0% vs. 23%; p = 0.13). There were no differences regarding the occurrence of late pneumonia or in the duration of mechanical ventilation between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these findings, early tracheostomy should be considered in patients with acute severe brain injury.

摘要

目的

比较急性重度颅脑损伤患者行早期气管切开术和晚期气管切开术的效果。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,共纳入了 28 名在巴西茹伊斯迪福拉联邦大学医院 ICU 就诊的患者,这些患者入院时患有急性重度颅脑损伤,入院 48 小时内格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分<8。患者被分为两组:早期气管切开术(ET)组,在入院后 8 天内进行;晚期气管切开术(LT)组,在入院后第 8 天进行。入院时,我们收集了人口统计学数据并确定了以下评分:急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)Ⅱ评分、GCS 评分和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。

结果

两组之间在人口统计学数据或评分方面均无显著差异:APACHEⅡ评分(26±6 与 28±8;p=0.37)、SOFA 评分(6.3±2.7 与 7.2±3.0;p=0.43)和 GCS 评分(5.4±1.7 与 5.5±1.7;p=0.87)。ET 组的 28 天死亡率较低(9%与 47%;p=0.04)。ET 组的早期(第 1 天内)医院获得性肺炎发生率较低,但差异无统计学意义(0%与 23%;p=0.13)。两组之间的迟发性肺炎发生率或机械通气时间均无差异。

结论

基于这些发现,急性重度颅脑损伤患者应考虑行早期气管切开术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验