Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Center for Anatomy Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Schumannstr. 20/21, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 2010 Oct;36(4):722-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00146609. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
German anatomist Max Clara (1899-1966) described the "Clara cell" of the bronchiolar epithelium in 1937. The present article investigates Clara's relationship with National Socialism, as well as his use of tissue from executed prisoners for research purposes, details about both of which are largely unknown to date. Our methodology for the present study focussed on analysis of material from historical archives and the publications of Clara and his co-workers. Clara was appointed as Chair of Anatomy at Leipzig University (Leipzig, Germany) in 1935. He owed his career, at least in part, to Nazi support. He was an active member of the Nazi party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP)) and engaged in university politics; this included making anti-Semitic statements about other academics in appointment procedures. Nevertheless, he also supported prosecuted colleagues. Much of Clara's histological research in Leipzig, including his original description of the bronchial epithelium, was based on tissue taken from prisoners executed in nearby Dresden (Germany). Max Clara was an active and outspoken Nazi and his histological research exploited the rising number of executions during the Nazi period. Clara's discovery is thus linked to the Nazi system. The facts given in the present paper invite discussion about the eponym's neglected history and its continued and problematic use in medical terminology.
德国解剖学家马克斯·克拉拉(Max Clara)于 1937 年描述了细支气管上皮的“克拉拉细胞”。本文探讨了克拉拉与纳粹主义的关系,以及他将处决囚犯的组织用于研究的情况,这些细节目前在很大程度上仍不为人知。我们目前的研究方法主要集中在对历史档案和克拉拉及其同事的出版物的分析上。1935 年,克拉拉被任命为莱比锡大学(德国莱比锡)解剖学教授。他的职业生涯至少在一定程度上得益于纳粹的支持。他是纳粹党的积极成员,并参与大学政治;这包括在任命程序中对其他学者发表反犹太言论。尽管如此,他也支持被起诉的同事。克拉拉在莱比锡的大部分组织学研究,包括他对支气管上皮的原始描述,都是基于从附近德累斯顿(德国)被处决的囚犯身上提取的组织。马克斯·克拉拉是一个积极且直言不讳的纳粹分子,他的组织学研究利用了纳粹时期不断增加的处决人数。因此,克拉拉的发现与纳粹制度有关。本文所提供的事实引发了人们对这位以其名字命名的人的被忽视的历史及其在医学术语中的持续和有问题的使用的讨论。