Suppr超能文献

用于先天性色觉缺陷诊断的D15面板测试的定量评分方法。

Quantitative scoring methods for D15 panel tests in the diagnosis of congenital color vision deficiencies.

作者信息

Atchison D A, Bowman K J, Vingrys A J

机构信息

Department of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 1991 Jan;68(1):41-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199101000-00007.

Abstract

Farnsworth's standard D15 and L'Anthony's desaturated D15 panel tests were administered to 99 congenital red-green color defective subjects. The results were analyzed in three ways: (1) by summing the color differences between adjacent caps according to Bowman, (2) by averaging color difference vectors (CDV) according to Vingrys and King-Smith, and (3) by visually inspecting and counting the crossings. The Bowman measure was highly correlated with one of the CDV measures but provides less information regarding a cap arrangement. The desaturated D15 test can be expected to misclassify 5% of dichromats by type (protan/deutan) compared to a type misclassification rate of less than 0.1% for the D15 panel test. The correct diagnostic rates for type were 45% for the standard D15 test and 58% for the desaturated D15 test. However, the improvement in correct diagnostic rate for the latter test was accompanied by an increase in the misdiagnostic rate from 2 to 10%. The main value of the desaturated D15 test in congenital color vision diagnosis would seem to be in providing classification of those subjects who pass the standard D15 test. Quantitative scoring of the tests provides a good estimate of severity of defect. Visual inspection provides a similar diagnostic rate to CDV analysis, but has a lower type misdiagnostic rate at the desaturated D15 test and is more likely to be correct when the two methods disagree. We suggest that quantitative scoring techniques are of limited benefit for the clinical diagnosis of congenital color vision defects but that they are of use in clinical trials or for the monitoring of changes in color vision over time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对99名先天性红绿色觉缺陷患者进行了法恩斯沃思标准D15和L'安东尼去饱和D15色盘测试。结果通过三种方式进行分析:(1)根据鲍曼的方法,将相邻色盘之间的颜色差异相加;(2)根据温格里斯和金 - 史密斯的方法,对颜色差异向量(CDV)求平均值;(3)通过目视检查并计算交叉点。鲍曼测量方法与一种CDV测量方法高度相关,但关于色盘排列提供的信息较少。与D15色盘测试低于0.1%的类型错误分类率相比,预计去饱和D15测试会将5%的二色视者按类型(红色盲/绿色盲)错误分类。标准D15测试的类型正确诊断率为45%,去饱和D15测试为58%。然而,后一种测试正确诊断率的提高伴随着误诊率从2%增加到10%。去饱和D15测试在先天性色觉诊断中的主要价值似乎在于对通过标准D15测试的受试者进行分类。测试的定量评分能很好地估计缺陷的严重程度。目视检查提供的诊断率与CDV分析相似,但在去饱和D15测试中类型误诊率较低,并且当两种方法出现分歧时更有可能正确。我们认为,定量评分技术对先天性色觉缺陷的临床诊断益处有限,但在临床试验或监测色觉随时间的变化方面有用。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验