• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择监测低危前列腺癌的男性的风险分层。

Risk stratification of men choosing surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1779-85. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.001
PMID:20304433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3474981/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to predict biopsy progression in men on prostate cancer surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 376 men with a median age of 65.5 years (range 45.8 to 79.5) with low risk prostate cancer on surveillance underwent at least 1 followup biopsy after diagnosis. Progression was defined at surveillance biopsy as Gleason pattern 4 or 5, greater than 2 biopsy cores with cancer or greater than 50% involvement of any core with cancer. Proportional hazards analysis was used to evaluate the association between covariates and progression at surveillance biopsy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of disease progression.

RESULTS

Of the 376 men 123 (32.7%) had progression a median of 5.6 years (range 0.3 to 8.5) after diagnosis. Percent free PSA and maximum percent core involvement at diagnosis were associated with progression, allowing stratification of the progression risk at initial surveillance biopsy. Cancer presence and PSA density at initial surveillance biopsy were associated with subsequent progression, allowing stratification of the cumulative incidence of progression 3 years after initial surveillance biopsy (cumulative incidence 11.1%, 95% CI 4.7 to 25.2 for negative biopsy and PSAD less than 0.08 ng/ml/cm(3) vs 53.6%, 95% CI 38.6 to 70.0 for positive biopsy and PSAD 0.08 ng/ml/cm(3) or greater, log rank test p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical variables at diagnosis and at first surveillance biopsy during followup in an active surveillance program can be used to inform men about the likelihood of an unfavorable prostate biopsy. This information could improve patient and physician acceptance of active surveillance in carefully selected men.

摘要

目的

我们旨在预测接受前列腺癌监测男性的活检进展。

材料和方法

共有 376 名中位年龄为 65.5 岁(范围为 45.8 至 79.5)的低危前列腺癌男性患者在诊断后至少进行了一次后续活检。在监测活检中,进展定义为 Gleason 模式 4 或 5、2 个以上活检核心有癌或任何核心的癌累及超过 50%。比例风险分析用于评估协变量与监测活检进展之间的关联。Kaplan-Meier 法用于估计疾病进展的概率。

结果

在 376 名男性中,123 名(32.7%)在诊断后中位 5.6 年(范围 0.3 至 8.5)时出现进展。初始诊断时游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比和最大核心受累百分比与进展相关,允许在初始监测活检时对进展风险进行分层。初始监测活检时的癌症存在和 PSA 密度与后续进展相关,允许在初始监测活检后 3 年对进展累积发生率进行分层(累积发生率为阴性活检和 PSA 密度小于 0.08ng/ml/cm³的患者为 11.1%,95%CI 4.7 至 25.2;阳性活检和 PSA 密度为 0.08ng/ml/cm³或更高的患者为 53.6%,95%CI 38.6 至 70.0,对数秩检验 p<0.0001)。

结论

在主动监测期间,诊断时和首次监测活检时的临床变量可用于告知男性不利前列腺活检的可能性。这些信息可以提高在精心挑选的男性中对主动监测的患者和医生的接受程度。

相似文献

1
Risk stratification of men choosing surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.选择监测低危前列腺癌的男性的风险分层。
J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1779-85. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
2
Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.在前列腺癌主动监测期间进行常规移行区活检可能有助于提高病理进展的检出率。
J Urol. 2014 Oct;192(4):1088-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
3
Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.主动监测患者中与前列腺癌进展相关的活检特征:三种统计模型的比较。
BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):574-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11127.x. Epub 2012 May 4.
4
Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.基于人群的研究显示,存在 Gleason 3+3 的患者出现分级进展。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1689-1699. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2047-z. Epub 2017 May 12.
5
Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density.血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)浓度与低 PSA 密度男性后续主动监测前列腺活检中疾病再分类的速率呈正相关。
BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):561-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12131. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
6
Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program.在前列腺癌监测计划中,随访期间前列腺特异性抗原动力学是干预的不可靠触发因素。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 10;28(17):2810-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.7311. Epub 2010 May 3.
7
Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort.当代队列中前列腺癌管理的主动监测
Cancer. 2008 Jun 15;112(12):2664-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23502.
8
MRI-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Predicts Gleason Score Upgrade in an Active Surveillance Cohort.基于 MRI 的前列腺特异性抗原密度可预测主动监测队列中 Gleason 评分升级。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Mar;214(3):574-578. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21559. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Eleven-year management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: what have we learned?前列腺癌患者11年的主动监测管理:我们学到了什么?
Tumori. 2017 Sep 18;103(5):464-474. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000649. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
10
Accuracy of PCA3 measurement in predicting short-term biopsy progression in an active surveillance program.PCA3 测量在主动监测方案中预测短期活检进展的准确性。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):534-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Implicit versus explicit Bayesian priors for epistemic uncertainty estimation in clinical decision support.临床决策支持中用于认知不确定性估计的隐式与显式贝叶斯先验
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jul 29;4(7):e0000801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000801. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The association between patient and disease characteristics, and the risk of disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.前列腺癌主动监测患者的患者和疾病特征与疾病进展风险之间的关联。
World J Urol. 2024 Feb 19;42(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04805-9.
3
Active Surveillance-Is It Feasible for Intermediate-risk Localised Prostate Cancer?

本文引用的文献

1
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
2
What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database.新诊断前列腺癌患者中适合进行监测的比例是多少?对CaPSURE数据库的分析。
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
3
Role of repeated biopsy of the prostate in predicting disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
主动监测——对中危局限性前列腺癌是否可行?
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Jan 8;24:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.12.005. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Biomarkers in active surveillance.主动监测中的生物标志物。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):155-159. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.26.
5
Role of Surveillance Biopsy with No Cancer as a Prognostic Marker for Reclassification: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.作为重新分类的预后标志物,无癌症监测活检的作用:来自 Canary 前列腺主动监测研究的结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):706-712. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
6
Diffusion weighted imaging of the prostate-principles, application, and advances.前列腺的扩散加权成像——原理、应用及进展
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):490-498. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.06.
7
Prostate Biopsy in Active Surveillance Protocols: Immediate Re-biopsy and Timing of Subsequent Biopsies.主动监测方案中的前列腺活检:即刻重复活检及后续活检时机
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Jul;18(7):48. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0702-y.
8
Automated analysis of co-localized protein expression in histologic sections of prostate cancer.前列腺癌组织学切片中共定位蛋白表达的自动化分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 26;12(5):e0178362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178362. eCollection 2017.
9
Standard and Targeted Biopsy During Follow-up for Active Surveillance.主动监测随访期间的标准活检和靶向活检
Rev Urol. 2015;17(2):112-3. doi: 10.3909/riu0670a.
10
Prostate-specific antigen density as a parameter for the prediction of positive lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy.前列腺特异性抗原密度作为根治性前列腺切除术中预测淋巴结转移阳性的一个参数。
Urol Ann. 2015 Oct-Dec;7(4):433-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152118.
前列腺重复活检在预测接受主动监测的前列腺癌患者疾病进展中的作用。
Cancer. 2008 Jul 15;113(2):286-92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23575.
4
Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer: review of the current literature.早期前列腺癌的主动监测:当前文献综述
Cancer. 2008 Apr 15;112(8):1650-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23373.
5
Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline.量化前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查在美国前列腺癌死亡率下降中的作用。
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Mar;19(2):175-81. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9083-8. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
6
Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.以治愈为目的的前列腺癌观察等待管理:约翰霍普金斯医院经验的更新
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2359-64; discussion 2364-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.039. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment.低风险前列腺癌的当代趋势:风险评估与治疗
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 2):S14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.135. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
8
Local progression among men with conservatively treated localized prostate cancer: results from the Transatlantic Prostate Group.接受保守治疗的局限性前列腺癌男性患者的局部进展:来自跨大西洋前列腺癌研究组的结果。
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):347-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.015. Epub 2007 May 30.
9
Estimating lead time and overdiagnosis associated with PSA screening from prostate cancer incidence trends.根据前列腺癌发病率趋势估算与PSA筛查相关的提前期和过度诊断。
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):10-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00825.x. Epub 2007 May 14.
10
PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section.前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间可预测筛查发现的前列腺癌主动监测后的结局:欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究瑞典部分的结果
Int J Cancer. 2007 Jan 1;120(1):170-4. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22161.