• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动控制在快速指令性任务学习中的作用。

A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning.

作者信息

Cole Michael W, Patrick Lauren M, Meiran Nachshon, Braver Todd S

机构信息

Psychology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130, United States; Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, NJ 07102, United States.

Psychology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004
PMID:28651787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5742075/
Abstract

Humans are often remarkably fast at learning novel tasks from instructions. Such rapid instructed task learning (RITL) likely depends upon the formation of new associations between long-term memory representations, which must then be actively maintained to enable successful task implementation. Consequently, we hypothesized that RITL relies more heavily on a proactive mode of cognitive control, in which goal-relevant information is actively maintained in preparation for anticipated high control demands. We tested this hypothesis using a recently developed cognitive paradigm consisting of 60 novel tasks involving RITL and 4 practiced tasks, with identical task rules and stimuli used across both task types. A robust behavioral cost was found in novel relative to practiced task performance, which was present even when the two were randomly inter-mixed, such that task-switching effects were equated. Novelty costs were most prominent under time-limited preparation conditions. In self-paced conditions, increased preparation time was found for novel trials, and was selectively associated with enhanced performance, suggesting greater proactive control for novel tasks. These results suggest a key role for proactive cognitive control in the ability to rapidly learn novel tasks from instructions.

摘要

人类通常能非常快速地根据指令学习新任务。这种快速的指令性任务学习(RITL)可能依赖于长期记忆表征之间新关联的形成,这些关联随后必须被积极维持,以使任务能够成功执行。因此,我们假设RITL更依赖于一种主动的认知控制模式,即与目标相关的信息被积极维持,以应对预期的高控制需求。我们使用一种最近开发的认知范式来检验这一假设,该范式包括60个涉及RITL的新任务和4个已练习的任务,两种任务类型使用相同的任务规则和刺激。相对于已练习的任务表现,新任务表现中发现了显著的行为代价,即使两者随机混合时这种代价依然存在,从而使任务切换效应相等。在时间有限的准备条件下,新奇代价最为显著。在自定节奏的条件下,新任务试验的准备时间增加,并且与表现的提高选择性相关,这表明对新任务有更强的主动控制。这些结果表明,主动认知控制在根据指令快速学习新任务的能力中起着关键作用。

相似文献

1
A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning.主动控制在快速指令性任务学习中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Rapid instructed task learning (but not automatic effects of instructions) is influenced by working memory load.快速指导任务学习(但不是指令的自动影响)受工作记忆负荷的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 6;14(6):e0217681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217681. eCollection 2019.
3
Prefrontal dynamics underlying rapid instructed task learning reverse with practice.前额叶动力学是快速指令任务学习的基础,随着练习而反向变化。
J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14245-54. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1662-10.2010.
4
Different mechanisms can account for the instruction induced proportion congruency effect.不同的机制可以解释指令诱导的比例一致性效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
On the efficiency of instruction-based rule encoding.论基于指令的规则编码的效率。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:4-19. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
6
The role of working memory in rapid instructed task learning and intention-based reflexivity: An individual differences examination.工作记忆在快速指令性任务学习和基于意图的自反性中的作用:一项个体差异研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Sep;90:180-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.任务新颖性悖论:快速指令任务学习过程中对不灵活神经通路的灵活控制。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
8
Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions.在提示-任务指令后的首次试验中,从任务冲突效应中自动检索新指示的提示-任务关联。
Exp Psychol. 2017 Jan;64(1):37-48. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000349.
9
Can we learn to learn? The influence of procedural working-memory training on rapid instructed-task-learning.我们能学会学习吗?程序性工作记忆训练对快速指令性任务学习的影响。
Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):132-146. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1122-4. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
10
Rapid instruction-based task learning (RITL) in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的基于快速指令的任务学习(RITL)。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Jul;127(5):513-528. doi: 10.1037/abn0000354. Epub 2018 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice reshapes the geometry and dynamics of task-tailored representations.实践重塑了任务定制表征的几何结构和动态特性。
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf125.
2
It's Hard to Prepare for Task Novelty: Cueing the Novelty of Upcoming Tasks Does Not Facilitate Task Performance.难以应对任务新奇性:提示即将到来任务的新奇性并不能促进任务表现。
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 15;8(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.423. eCollection 2025.
3
Practice Reshapes the Geometry and Dynamics of Task-tailored Representations.实践重塑了任务定制表征的几何结构和动态变化。

本文引用的文献

1
The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.任务新颖性悖论:快速指令任务学习过程中对不灵活神经通路的灵活控制。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
2
Self-paced preparation for a task switch eliminates attentional inertia but not the performance switch cost.为任务切换进行的自主节奏准备消除了注意惯性,但并未消除执行切换成本。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jun;43(6):862-873. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000347. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
The Behavioral Relevance of Task Information in Human Prefrontal Cortex.
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 15:2024.09.12.612718. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.12.612718.
4
Disrupted Salience and Cingulo-Opercular Network Connectivity During Impaired Rapid Instructed Task Learning in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者在快速指令性任务学习受损期间显著网络和扣带回-岛盖网络连接中断。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;9(2):210-221. doi: 10.1177/2167702620959341. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
5
Benefits and costs of self-paced preparation of novel task instructions.自主制定新任务说明的益处与成本。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 6;8(10):210762. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210762. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Exploring the Link between Novel Task Proceduralization and Motor Simulation.探索新型任务程序化与运动模拟之间的联系。
J Cogn. 2021 Sep 27;4(1):57. doi: 10.5334/joc.190. eCollection 2021.
7
Neural Mechanisms of Observational Learning: A Neural Working Model.观察性学习的神经机制:一种神经工作模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 22;14:609312. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.609312. eCollection 2020.
8
Representational Organization of Novel Task Sets during Proactive Encoding.主动编码过程中新颖任务集的表象组织。
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 16;39(42):8386-8397. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0725-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
The instruction-based congruency effect predicts task execution efficiency: Evidence from inter- and intra-individual differences.基于指令的一致性效应预测任务执行效率:来自个体间和个体内差异的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Nov;47(8):1582-1591. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00951-3.
人类前额叶皮质中任务信息的行为相关性
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2497-505. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv072. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
4
Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach.认知努力:一种神经经济学方法。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):395-415. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y.
5
Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus-response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials.新指令刺激-反应规则的反射性激活:来自停止试验中侧化准备电位的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):365-73. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0321-8.
6
Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control.多任务连接揭示了用于自适应任务控制的灵活枢纽。
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Sep;16(9):1348-55. doi: 10.1038/nn.3470. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
7
The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.控制的预期价值:前扣带皮层功能的综合理论。
Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):217-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007.
8
Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models.线性混合效应模型中用于检验交互作用的随机效应结构。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 5;4:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328. eCollection 2013.
9
Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance?刺激-反应规则是否在任务集准备和维持过程中以语音形式呈现?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1538-51. doi: 10.1037/a0031672. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
10
Rapid instructed task learning: a new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control.快速指令性任务学习:揭示人类大脑灵活认知控制独特能力的新窗口。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Mar;13(1):1-22. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0125-7.