Suppr超能文献

主动控制在快速指令性任务学习中的作用。

A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning.

作者信息

Cole Michael W, Patrick Lauren M, Meiran Nachshon, Braver Todd S

机构信息

Psychology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130, United States; Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, NJ 07102, United States.

Psychology Department, Washington University in St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

Abstract

Humans are often remarkably fast at learning novel tasks from instructions. Such rapid instructed task learning (RITL) likely depends upon the formation of new associations between long-term memory representations, which must then be actively maintained to enable successful task implementation. Consequently, we hypothesized that RITL relies more heavily on a proactive mode of cognitive control, in which goal-relevant information is actively maintained in preparation for anticipated high control demands. We tested this hypothesis using a recently developed cognitive paradigm consisting of 60 novel tasks involving RITL and 4 practiced tasks, with identical task rules and stimuli used across both task types. A robust behavioral cost was found in novel relative to practiced task performance, which was present even when the two were randomly inter-mixed, such that task-switching effects were equated. Novelty costs were most prominent under time-limited preparation conditions. In self-paced conditions, increased preparation time was found for novel trials, and was selectively associated with enhanced performance, suggesting greater proactive control for novel tasks. These results suggest a key role for proactive cognitive control in the ability to rapidly learn novel tasks from instructions.

摘要

人类通常能非常快速地根据指令学习新任务。这种快速的指令性任务学习(RITL)可能依赖于长期记忆表征之间新关联的形成,这些关联随后必须被积极维持,以使任务能够成功执行。因此,我们假设RITL更依赖于一种主动的认知控制模式,即与目标相关的信息被积极维持,以应对预期的高控制需求。我们使用一种最近开发的认知范式来检验这一假设,该范式包括60个涉及RITL的新任务和4个已练习的任务,两种任务类型使用相同的任务规则和刺激。相对于已练习的任务表现,新任务表现中发现了显著的行为代价,即使两者随机混合时这种代价依然存在,从而使任务切换效应相等。在时间有限的准备条件下,新奇代价最为显著。在自定节奏的条件下,新任务试验的准备时间增加,并且与表现的提高选择性相关,这表明对新任务有更强的主动控制。这些结果表明,主动认知控制在根据指令快速学习新任务的能力中起着关键作用。

相似文献

1
A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Rapid instructed task learning (but not automatic effects of instructions) is influenced by working memory load.
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 6;14(6):e0217681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217681. eCollection 2019.
3
Prefrontal dynamics underlying rapid instructed task learning reverse with practice.
J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14245-54. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1662-10.2010.
4
Different mechanisms can account for the instruction induced proportion congruency effect.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
On the efficiency of instruction-based rule encoding.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:4-19. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
6
The role of working memory in rapid instructed task learning and intention-based reflexivity: An individual differences examination.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Sep;90:180-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
9
Can we learn to learn? The influence of procedural working-memory training on rapid instructed-task-learning.
Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):132-146. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1122-4. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
10
Rapid instruction-based task learning (RITL) in schizophrenia.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Jul;127(5):513-528. doi: 10.1037/abn0000354. Epub 2018 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice reshapes the geometry and dynamics of task-tailored representations.
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf125.
3
Practice Reshapes the Geometry and Dynamics of Task-tailored Representations.
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 15:2024.09.12.612718. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.12.612718.
4
Disrupted Salience and Cingulo-Opercular Network Connectivity During Impaired Rapid Instructed Task Learning in Schizophrenia.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;9(2):210-221. doi: 10.1177/2167702620959341. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
5
Benefits and costs of self-paced preparation of novel task instructions.
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 6;8(10):210762. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210762. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Exploring the Link between Novel Task Proceduralization and Motor Simulation.
J Cogn. 2021 Sep 27;4(1):57. doi: 10.5334/joc.190. eCollection 2021.
7
Neural Mechanisms of Observational Learning: A Neural Working Model.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Apr 22;14:609312. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.609312. eCollection 2020.
8
Representational Organization of Novel Task Sets during Proactive Encoding.
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 16;39(42):8386-8397. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0725-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
2
Self-paced preparation for a task switch eliminates attentional inertia but not the performance switch cost.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jun;43(6):862-873. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000347. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
The Behavioral Relevance of Task Information in Human Prefrontal Cortex.
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2497-505. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv072. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
4
Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):395-415. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y.
6
Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control.
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Sep;16(9):1348-55. doi: 10.1038/nn.3470. Epub 2013 Jul 28.
7
The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.
Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):217-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007.
8
Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models.
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 5;4:328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328. eCollection 2013.
9
Are stimulus-response rules represented phonologically for task-set preparation and maintenance?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1538-51. doi: 10.1037/a0031672. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
10
Rapid instructed task learning: a new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Mar;13(1):1-22. doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0125-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验