Stanford University, School of Education, Stanford, CA 94305-3096, USA.
Child Dev. 2010 Jan-Feb;81(1):270-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01394.x.
This study examined the direct and interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socioemotional and cognitive development in three hundred and thirty-eight 5- to 6-year-old children. Neurobiological stress reactivity was measured as respiratory sinus arrhythmia and salivary cortisol responses to social, cognitive, sensory, and emotional challenges. Adaptation was assessed using child, parent, and teacher reports of externalizing symptoms, prosocial behaviors, school engagement, and academic competence. Results revealed significant interactions between reactivity and adversity. High stress reactivity was associated with more maladaptive outcomes in the context of high adversity but with better adaption in the context of low adversity. The findings corroborate a reconceptualization of stress reactivity as biological sensitivity to context by showing that high reactivity can both hinder and promote adaptive functioning.
本研究考察了应激反应和家庭逆境对 338 名 5 至 6 岁儿童社会情感和认知发展的直接和交互影响。神经生物学应激反应通过呼吸窦性心律失常和唾液皮质醇对社会、认知、感觉和情感挑战的反应来衡量。适应性通过儿童、父母和教师报告的外化症状、亲社会行为、学校参与度和学业能力来评估。研究结果显示,反应性和逆境之间存在显著的相互作用。在高逆境的情况下,高应激反应与更多的适应不良结果相关,但在低逆境的情况下,与更好的适应相关。这些发现通过表明高反应性既可以阻碍也可以促进适应性功能,支持了将应激反应重新概念化为对环境的生物敏感性的观点。