Murhekar Manoj, Moolenaar Ron, Hutin Yvan, Broome Claire
National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), R 127, Third Avenue, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Phase I and II, Ayapakkam, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Natl Med J India. 2009 Sep-Oct;22(5):252-6.
The new international Health Regulations, 2005, which came into force in 2007, establish a national focal point in each country to manage public health emergencies of international concern, including outbreaks. Investigating outbreaks is a challenging task. Often, pressure from decision-makers to hasten investigation may preclude proper evidence-based conclusions. Furthermore, the task of outbreak investigation is given to senior staff, who have limited time for field activities. The classical 10-step approach includes 4 main stages of (i) confirmation of the presence of the outbreak and of diagnosis using laboratory tests, (ii) generation of hypotheses regarding causation using descriptive epidemiology findings, (iii) hypothesis-testing using analytical epidemiology techniques, and (iv) institution of prevention measures. Peer-review at all stages of the investigation and reporting is the keystone of the quality assurance process. It is important to build capacity for outbreak Investigation. Two Field Epidemiology Training Programmes in India are trying to do this. In these programmes, epidemiologists-in-training take a lead in investigating outbreaks, while learning the ropes, with full technical support from the faculty. This training should spawn a culture of generating and using evidence for decision-making in the context of public health, and help strengthen health systems even beyond the domain of outbreaks.
2005年新的《国际卫生条例》于2007年生效,该条例在每个国家设立了一个国家归口单位,以管理包括疫情在内的国际关注的突发公共卫生事件。调查疫情是一项具有挑战性的任务。通常,决策者要求加快调查的压力可能会妨碍得出恰当的循证结论。此外,疫情调查工作交给了高级工作人员,而他们用于实地活动的时间有限。经典的十步法包括四个主要阶段:(i)通过实验室检测确认疫情的存在和诊断;(ii)利用描述性流行病学研究结果对病因提出假设;(iii)使用分析性流行病学技术对假设进行检验;(iv)采取预防措施。在调查和报告的各个阶段进行同行评审是质量保证过程的关键。培养疫情调查能力很重要。印度的两个现场流行病学培训项目正在努力做到这一点。在这些项目中,接受培训的流行病学家在学习过程中带头调查疫情,并得到教员的全面技术支持。这种培训应催生一种在公共卫生背景下为决策生成和使用证据的文化,并有助于加强卫生系统,甚至超出疫情领域。