• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估干预措施的初步研究,该措施旨在提高发展中国家潜在参与者对临床试验的认识。

A pilot study evaluating an intervention designed to raise awareness of clinical trials among potential participants in the developing world.

机构信息

Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2010 Apr;36(4):238-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033407.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2009.033407
PMID:20338937
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This pilot study evaluated the speaking book 'What it means to be part of a clinical trial'. The book aims at empowering populations with information on their rights and responsibilities when enrolled in clinical research. Wide publication of the book-at significant cost-is anticipated. It is important that the book is evaluated within the communities for whom it is intended, and the necessary changes (if any) are made, before translation and large-scale publication takes place.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to measure the efficacy and ease of use of the book.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from a catering company. Participants were questioned on their knowledge of clinical trials and were then given the book. Instructions for use of the book were given to one group ('experimental' group). The other group ('control' group) was not given any instructions. A week later, the investigators returned, repeated the knowledge questions and asked 'ease of use' questions.

RESULTS

A two-way repeated measure of covariants showed a statistically significant positive increase in knowledge of clinical trials among the intervention group (p=0.02). Results for the control group displayed trends that were not statistically significant. Percentage analysis of 'ease of use' questions proved that the book is easy to use, although some changes would be beneficial.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the speaking book is easy to use. It significantly increased knowledge of clinical trials among the study sample if instructions on use of the book were provided.

摘要

背景

本试点研究评估了有声读物《参与临床试验意味着什么》。该书旨在为参与临床研究的人群提供有关其权利和责任的信息。预计该书将以高昂的成本广泛出版。在进行翻译和大规模出版之前,重要的是要在该书的目标受众群体中对其进行评估,并在必要时进行修改。

目的

本研究旨在衡量该书的功效和易用性。

方法

参与者从一家餐饮公司招募。参与者被问及他们对临床试验的了解,然后向他们提供该书。对一组参与者(“实验组”)进行了使用该书的说明。另一组(“对照组”)未提供任何说明。一周后,调查人员返回,重复了知识问题,并询问了“易用性”问题。

结果

双向重复测量协方差显示,干预组的临床试验知识呈统计学显著正向增加(p=0.02)。对照组的结果显示出没有统计学意义的趋势。“易用性”问题的百分比分析表明,尽管有些更改将是有益的,但该书易于使用。

结论

本研究表明,有声读物易于使用。如果提供了使用该书的说明,它会显著提高研究样本对临床试验的了解。

相似文献

1
A pilot study evaluating an intervention designed to raise awareness of clinical trials among potential participants in the developing world.一项评估干预措施的初步研究,该措施旨在提高发展中国家潜在参与者对临床试验的认识。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Apr;36(4):238-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033407.
2
Consent in clinical trials: what do patients know?临床试验中的知情同意:患者知道什么?
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;31(5):443-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 10.
3
Assessment of the impact of a patient clinical trials handbook among pharmacy students.评估患者临床试验手册对药学专业学生的影响。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.007.
4
Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.理解癌症临床试验参与者参与研究的决策:与知情同意、患者满意度和决策后悔相关的因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
5
Testing an alternate informed consent process.测试一种替代的知情同意程序。
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c3df5.
6
Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.癌症临床试验参与者的知识水平和认知理解——与知情同意程序相关的因素。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):77-84. doi: 10.1177/1740774510384516. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
7
What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.我们的患者对他们的试验参与有何了解?评估患者对随机临床试验知情同意咨询的理解。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):74-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.035485. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
8
Process for obtaining informed consent: women's opinions.获取知情同意的过程:女性的观点
Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):197-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00183.x.
9
[Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo].[研究设计中的随机化前处理:突破禁忌]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Sep 20;152(38):2053-6.
10
[The need for uncertainty in clinical research. Equipoise].[临床研究中不确定性的必要性。 equipoise(平衡原则)]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(49):A3846.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of a speaking book® to enhance vaccine knowledge among caregivers in The Gambia: A study using qualitative and quantitative methods.使用有声读物提高冈比亚看护者的疫苗知识:一项使用定性和定量方法的研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 8;11(3):e040507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040507.
2
Recall and decay of consent information among parents of infants participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial using an audio-visual tool in The Gambia.冈比亚一项采用视听工具的随机对照临床试验中婴儿父母对同意信息的回忆和遗忘情况。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Sep 2;13(9):2185-2191. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1320624. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
A multimedia consent tool for research participants in the Gambia: a randomized controlled trial.
针对冈比亚研究参与者的多媒体同意工具:一项随机对照试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 May 1;93(5):320-328A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.146159. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
4
Multimedia Informed Consent Tool for a Low Literacy African Research Population: Development and Pilot-Testing.针对非洲低识字率研究人群的多媒体知情同意工具:开发与预测试
J Clin Res Bioeth. 2014 Apr 5;5(3):178. doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000178.
5
Multi-Media Educational Tool Increases Knowledge of Clinical Trials in Uganda.多媒体教育工具提高了乌干达对临床试验的认知。
J Clin Res Bioeth. 2014 Jan 2;5:165. doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000165.
6
Introduction: the Fogarty International Research Ethics Education and Curriculum Development Program in historical context.引言:历史背景下的福格蒂国际研究伦理教育与课程开发项目
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Dec;8(5):3-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.3.