• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[持续健康教育中的参与式管理:护士的观点]

[Participative management in permanent health education: view of the nurses].

作者信息

Medeiros Adriane Calvetti de, Pereira Queli Lisiane Castro, Siqueira Hedi Crecencia Heckler de, Cecagno Diana, Moraes Cristiane Lima

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, RS.

出版信息

Rev Bras Enferm. 2010 Jan-Feb;63(1):38-42. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672010000100007.

DOI:10.1590/s0034-71672010000100007
PMID:20339753
Abstract

This study is of qualitative approach, and aimed at knowing the management strategies, on the basis of the Permanent Education in Health (PEH). The participants of the research had been six nurses of an intensive care unit from an university hospital in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The Method Circle of Culture of Freire was used like as instrument for collection of data. The data were collected in the period from June to august, 2007. Results point out participative planning and decision making as strategies of the PEH that promotes the autonomy, the valuation, the technical ability and the work construction in team, in its proper passage of learning.

摘要

本研究采用定性研究方法,旨在基于健康终身教育(PEH)了解管理策略。研究参与者为巴西南里奥格兰德州一家大学医院重症监护室的六名护士。采用弗莱雷文化方法圈作为数据收集工具。数据于2007年6月至8月期间收集。结果指出,参与式规划和决策是健康终身教育的策略,在其适当的学习过程中促进了自主性、评估、技术能力和团队工作建设。

相似文献

1
[Participative management in permanent health education: view of the nurses].[持续健康教育中的参与式管理:护士的观点]
Rev Bras Enferm. 2010 Jan-Feb;63(1):38-42. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672010000100007.
2
[Popular knowledge and health education in nursing training].[护理培训中的大众知识与健康教育]
Rev Bras Enferm. 2004 Mar-Apr;57(2):165-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672004000200007.
3
[Teaching strategies of nursing care: a look on pedagogical trends].[护理教学策略:对教学趋势的审视]
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2011 Dec;32(4):688-94. doi: 10.1590/s1983-14472011000400008.
4
[The assessment of simulation practice learning in nursing education as feedback].[将模拟实践学习评估作为反馈应用于护理教育]
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2010 Sep;31(3):552-6. doi: 10.1590/s1983-14472010000300020.
5
[Southern Brazilian Nursing School's profile in the period of its founders].[巴西南部护理学校在其创办时期的概况]
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2008 Mar;29(1):98-103.
6
[Institutional characteristics that interfere in the leadership of nurses].[影响护士领导力的机构特征]
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2009 Jun;30(2):214-20.
7
[Nursing and planning in health: management report as an instrument of health planning].《健康领域的护理与规划:作为健康规划工具的管理报告》
Rev Bras Enferm. 2004 Jul-Aug;57(4):500-3. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672004000400025.
8
[Experiences of learning about nursing care].[学习护理的经历]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009 Sep;43(3):506-11. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342009000300002.
9
[The reality of the education of the nurses' aide and technician in Rio Grande do Sul and the performance of the Education Commission of the Brazilian Nursing Association--the Rio Grande do Sul Section].
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 1991 Jan;12(1):46-52.
10
[Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Nursing: open doors].[南里奥格兰德联邦大学护理学院:敞开大门]
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2007 Sep;28(3):424-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the concept of nurses' autonomy in intensive care units: A hybrid model.重症监护室护士自主性概念分析:混合模型。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2023 Jun;41(2). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e17.
2
Quality Program: what influences the opinion of nursing team.质量计划:什么影响护理团队的意见。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016 Oct-Dec;14(4):547-552. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016GS3615.
3
The nursing staff opinion about the continuous quality improvement program of a university hospital.护理人员对某大学医院持续质量改进项目的看法。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2014 Apr;12(2):211-6. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082014ao2833.
4
[Permanent education in health: a review].[健康领域的终身教育:综述]
Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Feb;48(1):170-85. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048004498.