• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“最老的老人”(即 85 岁及以上人群)在 CC75C 基于人群的队列中的死亡地点。

Place of death for the 'oldest old': > or =85-year-olds in the CC75C population-based cohort.

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Apr;60(573):171-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483959.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp10X483959
PMID:20353663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2845508/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deaths are rising fastest among the oldest old but data on their transitions in place of care at the end of life are scarce.

AIM

To examine the place of residence or care of > or =85 year-olds less than a year before death, and their place of death, and to map individual changes between the two.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Cambridge City over-75s Cohort (CC75C) study, UK.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of prospective data from males and females aged > or =85 years at death who died within a year of taking part in any CC75C survey (n = 320); death certificate linkage.

RESULTS

Only 7% changed their address in their last year of life, yet 52% died somewhere other than their usual address at the time of death. Over two-thirds were living in the community when interviewed <1 year before death, but less than one-third who had lived at home died there (less than one-fifth in sheltered housing). Care homes were the usual address of most people dying there (77% in residential homes, 87% in nursing homes) but 15% of deaths in acute hospital came from care homes.

CONCLUSION

More than half the study sample of individuals of advanced old age had a change in their place of residence or care in their last year of life. These findings add weight to calls for improved end-of-life care in all settings, regardless of age, to avoid unnecessary transfers. The study data provide a baseline that can help plan and monitor initiatives to promote choice in location of care at the end of life for the very old.

摘要

背景

最年长的老年人的死亡率增长最快,但关于他们在生命末期的护理场所转移的数据却很少。

目的

研究 85 岁以上人群在死亡前不到一年的居住地或护理地,以及他们的死亡地,并绘制两者之间的个体变化图。

研究设计

基于人群的队列研究。

地点

英国剑桥市 75 岁以上人群队列(CC75C)研究。

方法

对死亡时年龄大于或等于 85 岁且在参与任何 CC75C 调查的一年内死亡的男性和女性的前瞻性数据进行回顾性分析(n=320);死亡证明链接。

结果

只有 7%的人在生命的最后一年改变了地址,但 52%的人在死亡时不在他们通常的地址。在接受访谈前不到一年时,超过三分之二的人居住在社区,但只有不到三分之一的人在家中去世(不到五分之一住在庇护性住房中)。养老院是大多数在那里去世的人的常居地(77%在养老院,87%在护理院),但 15%的急性医院死亡来自养老院。

结论

在这项研究中,超过一半的高龄个体样本在生命的最后一年中经历了居住地或护理地的变化。这些发现进一步支持了在所有环境中改善临终关怀的呼吁,无论年龄大小,以避免不必要的转移。研究数据提供了一个基线,可以帮助规划和监测在生命末期促进老年人选择护理地点的举措。

相似文献

1
Place of death for the 'oldest old': > or =85-year-olds in the CC75C population-based cohort.“最老的老人”(即 85 岁及以上人群)在 CC75C 基于人群的队列中的死亡地点。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Apr;60(573):171-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483959.
2
Dying comfortably in very old age with or without dementia in different care settings - a representative "older old" population study.在不同护理环境中,患有或未患痴呆症的高龄老人舒适离世——一项具有代表性的“超高龄”人群研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 5;17(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0605-2.
3
Place of death and end-of-life transitions experienced by very old people with differing cognitive status: retrospective analysis of a prospective population-based cohort aged 85 and over.不同认知状态的超高龄人群的死亡地点和临终过渡期:一项针对 85 岁及以上人群的前瞻性基于人群队列的回顾性分析。
Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;28(3):220-33. doi: 10.1177/0269216313510341. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
4
The experience of transitions in care in very old age: implications for general practice.高龄老人在护理过渡期的体验:对全科医学的启示。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):778-784. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz014.
5
Place and cause of death in centenarians: a population-based observational study in England, 2001 to 2010.百岁老人的死亡地点与原因:2001年至2010年在英格兰开展的一项基于人群的观察性研究
PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 3;11(6):e1001653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001653. eCollection 2014 Jun.
6
Better quality of end-of-life care for persons with advanced dementia in nursing homes compared to hospitals: a Swedish national register study.养老院中晚期痴呆症患者的临终关怀质量优于医院:一项瑞典全国登记研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 26;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00639-5.
7
[The last year of life: a representative study of deceased patients. Living arrangement, place of death and utilization of health resources].[生命的最后一年:对已故患者的代表性研究。生活安排、死亡地点及卫生资源利用情况]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 1998 Jun;31(3):193-204. doi: 10.1007/s003910050034.
8
Comparison of end-of-life care for older people living at home and in residential homes: a mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.荷兰家庭和养老院中老年人临终关怀的比较:一项针对全科医生的死亡率随访研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Nov;65(640):e724-30. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687349.
9
End-of-life care in residential care homes: a retrospective study of the perspectives of family members using the VOICES questionnaire.养老院中的临终关怀:一项使用VOICES问卷对家庭成员观点的回顾性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Mar;31(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/scs.12317. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
The oldest old in the last year of life: population-based findings from Cambridge city over-75s cohort study participants aged 85 and older at death.生命最后一年的最年长老人:基于人群的剑桥市 75 岁以上队列研究参与者的发现,参与者在死亡时年龄为 85 岁及以上。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jan;58(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02622.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of functional disabilities, place of death and end-of-life medical expenditures among centenarians and non-centenarians in China: a series of cross-sectional studies.中国百岁老人与非百岁老人的功能残障、死亡地点和临终医疗支出比较:一系列横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04111-w.
2
Describing transitions in residential status over 10 years in the very old: results from the Newcastle 85+ Study.描述非常老年龄段人群在 10 年内居住状态的转变:纽卡斯尔 85+ 研究的结果。
Age Ageing. 2022 Mar 1;51(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac056.
3
Hospice care access inequalities: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.临终关怀服务可及性不平等:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Jun;12(2):142-151. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002719. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
Place of death among older people in Finland and Norway.芬兰和挪威老年人的死亡地点。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Dec;48(8):817-824. doi: 10.1177/1403494820944073. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
5
The experience of transitions in care in very old age: implications for general practice.高龄老人在护理过渡期的体验:对全科医学的启示。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):778-784. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz014.
6
Dying comfortably in very old age with or without dementia in different care settings - a representative "older old" population study.在不同护理环境中,患有或未患痴呆症的高龄老人舒适离世——一项具有代表性的“超高龄”人群研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 5;17(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0605-2.
7
Death and the Oldest Old: Attitudes and Preferences for End-of-Life Care--Qualitative Research within a Population-Based Cohort Study.死亡与高龄老人:临终关怀的态度与偏好——基于人群队列研究的定性研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 5;11(4):e0150686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150686. eCollection 2016.
8
Land use mix and five-year mortality in later life: Results from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study.晚年的土地利用混合与五年死亡率:认知功能与衰老研究的结果
Health Place. 2016 Mar;38:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
9
Caring for older people: is home care always best?关爱老年人:居家护理总是最佳选择吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Nov;65(640):565-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687265.
10
Community environment, cognitive impairment and dementia in later life: results from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study.社区环境、认知障碍与晚年痴呆:认知功能与衰老研究的结果
Age Ageing. 2015 Nov;44(6):1005-11. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv137. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The oldest old in the last year of life: population-based findings from Cambridge city over-75s cohort study participants aged 85 and older at death.生命最后一年的最年长老人:基于人群的剑桥市 75 岁以上队列研究参与者的发现,参与者在死亡时年龄为 85 岁及以上。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jan;58(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02622.x.
2
Associations between home death and GP involvement in palliative cancer care.居家死亡与全科医生参与癌症姑息治疗之间的关联。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Sep;59(566):671-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X454133.
3
Knowing patients' preferences for place of death: how possible or desirable?了解患者对死亡地点的偏好:可能性有多大或是否可取?
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Sep;59(566):642-3. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X454052.
4
GPs' awareness of patients' preference for place of death.全科医生对患者死亡地点偏好的认知。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Sep;59(566):665-70. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X454124.
5
Improving generalist end of life care: national consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups.改善全科医生临终关怀服务:与从业者、医疗服务专员、学者及服务用户群体进行全国性磋商。
BMJ. 2008 Oct 1;337:a1720. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1720.
6
Where people die (1974--2030): past trends, future projections and implications for care.人们的死亡地点(1974年至2030年):过去的趋势、未来的预测及其对护理的影响
Palliat Med. 2008 Jan;22(1):33-41. doi: 10.1177/0269216307084606.
7
Transitions between care settings at the end of life in belgium.比利时临终阶段护理机构之间的转换
JAMA. 2007 Oct 10;298(14):1638-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.14.1638.
8
Using death certificate data to study place of death in 9 European countries: opportunities and weaknesses.利用死亡证明数据研究9个欧洲国家的死亡地点:机遇与不足。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Oct 8;7:283. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-283.
9
Palliative care: a task for everyone.姑息治疗:人人有责。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jun;57(539):503.
10
Cohort profile: the Cambridge City over-75s Cohort (CC75C).队列简介:剑桥市75岁以上队列(CC75C)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;36(1):40-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl293.