• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在纵向研究中鼓励队列维持的因素。

Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study.

作者信息

Marmor J K, Oliveria S A, Donahue R P, Garrahie E J, White M J, Moore L L, Ellison R C

机构信息

Evans Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, MA 02118.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):531-5. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90216-v.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90216-v
PMID:2037857
Abstract

Maintenance of the cohort is one of the primary challenges of a longitudinal study. At the end of 3 years of follow up in the Framingham Children's Study, a longitudinal study of young children and their parents, 100 of the original 106 families (94.3%) have remained in the study. A questionnaire was administered to identify factors contributing to the high rate of follow up to this point in the study. The attitudes of the staff, feedback to the subjects, the staff's handling of questions and problems, and association with the Framingham Heart Study emerged as the most important factors influencing continued participation in the study. In addition, 99% of the subjects stated that they believed the medical research to be important. We conclude that the quality of the communication with study participants and the subjects' perceived importance of the research have been the key factors in maintaining the cohort in this longitudinal epidemiologic study.

摘要

维持队列是纵向研究的主要挑战之一。在弗雷明汉儿童研究(一项针对幼儿及其父母的纵向研究)随访3年结束时,最初的106个家庭中有100个(94.3%)仍在参与研究。通过发放问卷来确定促成该研究至此高随访率的因素。工作人员的态度、对受试者的反馈、工作人员对问题的处理以及与弗雷明汉心脏研究的关联成为影响继续参与研究的最重要因素。此外,99%的受试者表示他们认为医学研究很重要。我们得出结论,与研究参与者沟通的质量以及受试者所感知到的研究重要性是在这项纵向流行病学研究中维持队列的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Factors encouraging cohort maintenance in a longitudinal study.在纵向研究中鼓励队列维持的因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):531-5. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90216-v.
2
Advance care planning for children with special health care needs: a survey of parental attitudes.为有特殊医疗需求的儿童进行预先护理规划:家长态度调查
Pediatrics. 1996 May;97(5):682-7.
3
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Questionnaire on the Health Staff's Perceptions Regarding Doutores da Alegria's Interventions.《卫生人员对欢乐医生干预措施看法问卷》的验证性因子分析。
J Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(2):166-174. doi: 10.1177/1359105316650274. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
4
Effectiveness of instruction and video feedback on staff's use of prompts and children's adaptive responses during one-to-one training in children with severe to profound intellectual disability.在对严重至极重度智力残疾儿童进行一对一训练中,指导和视频反馈对员工使用提示和儿童适应性反应的有效性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):829-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.02.008. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
5
A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.一种基于家庭的方法预防有风险儿童的抑郁症状:父母和儿童变化的证据。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e119.
6
What does partnership in care mean for children's nurses?对儿童护士而言,护理伙伴关系意味着什么?
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):518-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01591.x.
7
Health care staff's opinions about existential issues among patients with cancer.医护人员对癌症患者存在问题的看法。
Palliat Support Care. 2010 Mar;8(1):59-68. doi: 10.1017/S147895150999071X. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
8
Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of school nurses and personnel and associations with nonmedical immunization exemptions.学校护士及工作人员的知识、态度和信念以及与非医疗免疫豁免的关联。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e552-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e552.
9
A modified screening tool for autism (Checklist for Autism in Toddlers [CHAT-23]) for Chinese children.一种针对中国儿童的改良版自闭症筛查工具(幼儿自闭症筛查清单[CHAT-23])。
Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2):e166-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.2.e166.
10
Coparenting in teen mothers and their children's fathers: evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study-birth cohort.青少年母亲及其孩子父亲的共同养育:来自幼儿纵向研究-出生队列的证据。
Acad Pediatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;12(6):539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Recruitment and Retention in Substance Use Disorder Research in Emergency Departments.优化急诊科物质使用障碍研究中的招募和保留。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 20;24(2):228-235. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57179.
2
Paediatric eye and vision research participation experiences: a systematic review.儿科眼科学和视觉研究参与体验的系统评价。
Trials. 2023 Jan 28;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07021-1.
3
Tracking Assault-injured, Drug-using Youth in Longitudinal Research: Follow-up Methods.追踪纵向研究中遭受攻击伤害和使用毒品的青少年:随访方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;25(11):1204-1215. doi: 10.1111/acem.13495. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
How to optimize participant retention and complete follow-up in surgical research.如何在外科研究中优化参与者保留率并完成随访。
Can J Surg. 2014 Dec;57(6):420-7. doi: 10.1503/cjs.006314.
5
Strategies for conducting adolescent health research in the clinical setting: the Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center HPV experience.在临床环境中开展青少年健康研究的策略:西奈山青少年健康中心的人乳头瘤病毒研究经验
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014 Oct;27(5):e103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
6
Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.大麻使用的一级预防:随机对照试验的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053187. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
7
Participant characteristics and study features associated with high retention rates in a longitudinal investigation of type 1 diabetes mellitus.与 1 型糖尿病纵向研究中高保留率相关的参与者特征和研究特征。
Clin Trials. 2012 Dec;9(6):798-805. doi: 10.1177/1740774512458986. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
8
Methods used for successful follow-up in a large scale national cohort study in Thailand.泰国一项大规模全国队列研究中用于成功随访的方法。
BMC Res Notes. 2011 May 27;4:166. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-166.
9
Feasibility of a longitudinal study of women anticipating first pregnancy and assessed by multiple pelvic exams: recruitment and retention challenges.对多名盆腔检查评估的预期首次妊娠的女性进行纵向研究的可行性:招募和保留挑战。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov;31(6):544-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
10
Mission in Sukusuku cohort, Mie: focusing on the feasibility and validity of methods for enrolling and retaining participants.三重县菰野队列研究的任务:重点关注招募和保留参与者方法的可行性和有效性。
J Epidemiol. 2010;20 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S407-12. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20090165. Epub 2010 Feb 23.