Coleman Grahame John
School of Psychology and Psychiatry, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Spring;37(1):74-82. doi: 10.3138/jvme.37.1.74.
Beliefs form a major component of public attitudes, and attitudes have a role in determining how people behave as consumers and as citizens. Their behavior in turn affects the commercial viability and even the sustainability of animal industries. Beliefs are subjective facts, that is, matters that individuals consider to be true. The process of informing the community necessarily involves changing beliefs and, to this extent, persuasion. Education strategies relating to welfare issues depend on the target group and the desired outcome. Target groups include farmers, post-farm gatekeepers including transport drivers and abattoir workers, carers of companion animals, legislators and regulators, retailers, and the general community. These target groups may not be homogeneous, but each nevertheless has identifiable needs for knowledge and skills relevant to welfare. The approach that is likely to be most effective is to provide appropriately targeted dispassionate and factual information to the community. In this way, when debates about animal welfare occur, all the stakeholders--including animal-rights groups, retailers, farmers, legislators, and regulators--who are involved in the debate are more likely to produce good outcomes if discussion is based on a shared understanding of what current practices are and what science can reveal about welfare. Given that the mass media are the preferred source of information, the use of science-based media coverage and informed ethical debate is likely to have the best effect, albeit over a fairly long time frame.
信念构成了公众态度的主要组成部分,而态度在决定人们作为消费者和公民的行为方式方面发挥着作用。他们的行为反过来又会影响动物产业的商业可行性乃至可持续性。信念是主观事实,即个人认为是真实的事情。向公众宣传必然涉及改变信念,在这个层面上就是说服。与福利问题相关的教育策略取决于目标群体和期望的结果。目标群体包括农民、农场后环节的从业者(如运输司机和屠宰场工人)、伴侣动物照料者、立法者和监管者、零售商以及普通公众。这些目标群体可能并不单一,但每个群体都有与福利相关的可识别的知识和技能需求。最有效的方法可能是向公众提供针对性适当、客观且真实的信息。这样一来,当围绕动物福利展开辩论时,如果讨论基于对当前做法以及科学能揭示的福利状况的共同理解,那么所有参与辩论的利益相关者——包括动物权利组织、零售商、农民、立法者和监管者——更有可能产生良好的结果。鉴于大众媒体是首选的信息来源,使用基于科学的媒体报道和明智的伦理辩论可能会产生最佳效果,尽管这需要相当长的时间。