Suppr超能文献

老年人长期透析的选择(BOLDE):与血液透析相比,老年患者腹膜透析的生活质量差异。

Broadening Options for Long-term Dialysis in the Elderly (BOLDE): differences in quality of life on peritoneal dialysis compared to haemodialysis for older patients.

机构信息

Imperial College Kidney and Transplant Institute, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Nov;25(11):3755-63. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq212. Epub 2010 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome for older people who are often on dialysis for life. Little is, however, known about differences in QOL on haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in older age groups. Randomising patients to either modality to assess outcomes is not feasible.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, multi-centred study we conducted QOL assessments (Short Form-12 Mental and Physical Component Summary scales, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale) in 140 people (aged 65 years or older) on PD and HD.

RESULTS

The groups were similar in age, gender, time on dialysis, ethnicity, Index of Deprivation (based on postcode), dialysis adequacy, cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Exam and Trail-Making Test B), nutritional status (Subjective Global Assessment) and social networks. There was a higher comorbidity score in the HD group. Regression analyses were undertaken to ascertain which variables significantly influence each QOL assessment. All were influenced by symptom count highlighting that the patient's perception of their symptoms is a critical determinant of their mental and physical well being. Modality was found to be an independent predictor of illness intrusion with greater intrusion felt in those on HD.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, in two closely matched demographic groups of older dialysis patients, QOL was similar, if not better, in those on PD. This study strongly supports offering PD to all suitable older people.

摘要

背景

健康相关生活质量(QOL)是经常需要终身透析的老年人的重要结局。然而,对于老年人群在血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)之间 QOL 的差异知之甚少。随机分配患者到任何一种治疗方式来评估结果是不可行的。

方法

在这项横断面、多中心研究中,我们对 140 名(年龄在 65 岁或以上)接受 PD 和 HD 的患者进行了 QOL 评估(SF-12 精神和身体成分综合量表、医院焦虑和抑郁量表以及疾病干扰评分量表)。

结果

两组在年龄、性别、透析时间、种族、贫困指数(基于邮政编码)、透析充分性、认知功能(简易精神状态检查和连线测试 B)、营养状况(主观整体评估)和社会网络方面相似。HD 组的合并症评分更高。我们进行了回归分析,以确定哪些变量对每项 QOL 评估有显著影响。所有这些都受到症状数量的影响,这突出表明患者对自身症状的感知是其心理和身体健康的关键决定因素。结果发现,治疗方式是疾病干扰的独立预测因素,HD 组患者的干扰感更强。

结论

总的来说,在两组年龄相近的老年透析患者中,PD 组的 QOL 相似,如果不是更好的话。这项研究强烈支持向所有合适的老年人提供 PD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/967c/2957589/d210615751c7/gfq212fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验