School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1200 Main St W, Room HSc-3N28G Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5.
BMJ. 2010 Apr 16;340:c1480. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1480.
To evaluate the impact of a provider initiated primary care outreach intervention compared with usual care among older adults at risk of functional decline.
Randomised controlled trial.
Patients enrolled with 35 family physicians in five primary care networks in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Patients were eligible if they were 75 years of age or older and were not receiving home care services. Of 3166 potentially eligible patients, 2662 (84%) completed the validated postal questionnaire used to determine risk of functional decline. Of 1724 patients who met the risk criteria, 769 (45%) agreed to participate and 719 were randomised.
The 12 month intervention, provided by experienced home care nurses in 2004-6, consisted of a comprehensive initial assessment using the resident assessment instrument for home care; collaborative care planning with patients, their families, and family physicians; health promotion; and referral to community health and social support services.
Quality adjusted life years (QALYs), use and costs of health and social services, functional status, self rated health, and mortality.
The mean difference in QALYs between intervention and control patients during the study period was not statistically significant (0.017, 95% confidence interval -0.022 to 0.056; P=0.388). The mean difference in overall cost of prescription drugs and services between the intervention and control groups was not statistically significant, (-$C165 ( pound107; euro118; $162), 95% confidence interval -$C16 545 to $C16 214; P=0.984). Changes over 12 months in functional status and self rated health were not significantly different between the intervention and control groups. Ten patients died in each group.
The results of this study do not support adoption of this preventive primary care intervention for this target population of high risk older adults. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00134836.
评估与常规护理相比,初级保健外展干预对有功能下降风险的老年人的影响。
随机对照试验。
在加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿的 35 位家庭医生所在的 5 个初级保健网络中招募患者。
如果患者年龄在 75 岁或以上且未接受家庭护理服务,则符合资格。在 3166 名潜在合格患者中,有 2662 名(84%)完成了用于确定功能下降风险的验证后邮购问卷。在符合风险标准的 1724 名患者中,有 769 名(45%)同意参加,其中 719 名被随机分配。
2004-2006 年,由经验丰富的家庭护理护士提供为期 12 个月的干预措施,包括使用居民评估工具进行全面的初始评估;与患者、他们的家人和家庭医生共同制定护理计划;健康促进;以及转介到社区卫生和社会支持服务。
调整后的生命质量年(QALYs)、卫生和社会服务的使用和成本、功能状态、自我评估健康状况和死亡率。
在研究期间,干预组和对照组患者的 QALY 平均差异无统计学意义(0.017,95%置信区间-0.022 至 0.056;P=0.388)。干预组和对照组之间的处方药和服务总成本平均差异无统计学意义,(-$C165(107 英镑;118 欧元;$162),95%置信区间-$C16545 至-$C16214;P=0.984)。干预组和对照组在 12 个月的功能状态和自我评估健康变化方面没有显著差异。每组有 10 名患者死亡。
这项研究的结果不支持为这一高风险老年人群采用这种预防性初级保健干预措施。试验注册Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00134836。