Friese Bettina, Bogenschneider Karen
Prevention Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Fam Relat. 2009 Mar 26;58(2):229-243. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00549.x.
Because scientific understanding of communicating family research to policymakers is incomplete, qualitative interviews were conducted with social scientists experienced in bridging the gulf between research and family policy. In keeping with the tenets of two communities and community dissonance theories, the underutilization of research in policymaking was attributed, in part, to misperceptions and miscommunication between researchers and policymakers who operate in different cultures. Social scientists identified cultural barriers they encountered and rewards they experienced when communicating research to policymakers. Ten recommendations detail pragmatic strategies for communicating across conflicting cultures to promote greater use of research in family policy decisions. The findings suggest a paradigm shift away from simply disseminating research to policymakers and toward developing collaborative relationships with them.
由于科学界对如何向政策制定者传达家庭研究的理解并不完善，因此我们对一些在弥合研究与家庭政策之间差距方面经验丰富的社会科学家进行了定性访谈。根据两个社区和社区失调理论的原则，研究在政策制定中未得到充分利用，部分原因是在不同文化背景下工作的研究人员和政策制定者之间存在误解和沟通不畅。社会科学家们指出了他们在与政策制定者交流研究成果时遇到的文化障碍以及获得的回报。十条建议详细阐述了跨越冲突文化进行沟通的实用策略，以促进在家庭政策决策中更多地运用研究成果。研究结果表明，应从单纯向政策制定者传播研究成果转向与他们建立合作关系，实现范式转变。
