Suppr超能文献

有效沟通当地政策制定者:传播政策简报以解决肥胖问题的随机试验。

Effectively communicating with local policymakers: a randomized trial of policy brief dissemination to address obesity.

机构信息

Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 8;12:1246897. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1246897. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based policies are a powerful tool for impacting health and addressing obesity. Effectively communicating evidence to policymakers is critical to ensure evidence is incorporated into policies. While all public health is local, limited knowledge exists regarding effective approaches for improving local policymakers' uptake of evidence-based policies.

METHODS

Local policymakers were randomized to view one of four versions of a policy brief (usual care, narrative, risk-framing, and narrative/risk-framing combination). They then answered a brief survey including questions about their impressions of the brief, their likelihood of using it, and how they determine legislative priorities.

RESULTS

Responses from 331 participants indicated that a majority rated local data (92%), constituent needs/opinions (92%), and cost-effectiveness data (89%) as important or very important in determining what issues they work on. The majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that briefs were understandable (87%), believable (77%), and held their attention (74%) with no brief version rated significantly higher than the others. Across the four types of briefs, 42% indicated they were likely to use the brief. Logistic regression models showed that those indicating that local data were important in determining what they work on were over seven times more likely to use the policy brief than those indicating that local data were less important in determining what they work on (aOR = 7.39, 95% CI = 1.86,52.57).

DISCUSSION

Among local policymakers in this study there was no dominant format or type of policy brief; all brief types were rated similarly highly. This highlights the importance of carefully crafting clear, succinct, credible, and understandable policy briefs, using different formats depending on communication objectives. Participants indicated a strong preference for receiving materials incorporating local data. To ensure maximum effect, every effort should be made to include data relevant to a policymaker's local area in policy communications.

摘要

简介

循证政策是影响健康和解决肥胖问题的有力工具。将证据有效地传达给政策制定者对于确保证据纳入政策至关重要。虽然所有公共卫生都是地方性的,但对于改善地方政策制定者采用基于证据的政策的有效方法,了解甚少。

方法

地方政策制定者被随机分配观看政策简报的四个版本之一(常规护理、叙述、风险框架和叙述/风险框架组合)。然后,他们回答了一份简短的调查,其中包括他们对简报的印象、使用它的可能性以及他们如何确定立法优先事项的问题。

结果

来自 331 名参与者的回应表明,大多数人认为本地数据(92%)、选民需求/意见(92%)和成本效益数据(89%)在确定他们关注的问题方面非常重要或重要。大多数受访者同意或强烈同意简报易懂(87%)、可信(77%)且吸引注意力(74%),没有一个简报版本的评分明显高于其他版本。在这四种类型的简报中,42%的人表示他们可能会使用该简报。逻辑回归模型表明,那些表示本地数据在确定他们关注的问题方面很重要的人,比那些表示本地数据在确定他们关注的问题方面不太重要的人,使用政策简报的可能性要高出七倍以上(优势比[aOR]=7.39,95%置信区间[CI]=1.86,52.57)。

讨论

在这项研究中的地方政策制定者中,没有一种主导的政策简报格式或类型;所有简报类型的评分都非常高。这突出表明精心制作清晰、简洁、可信且易懂的政策简报的重要性,根据沟通目标使用不同的格式。参与者表示强烈希望收到包含本地数据的材料。为了确保最大效果,应尽一切努力在政策沟通中纳入与政策制定者当地相关的数据。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
The Importance of Policy Change for Addressing Public Health Problems.政策变革对解决公共卫生问题的重要性。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov/Dec;133(1_suppl):9S-14S. doi: 10.1177/0033354918788880.
7
Public health is local.公共卫生是地方性事务。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep;2(9):e387. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30170-6. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验