• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于形容词顺序的语义限制的知识可能会被选择性地损害。

Knowledge of the Semantic Constraints on Adjective Order Can Be Selectively Impaired.

作者信息

Kemmerer David, Tranel Daniel, Zdanczyk Cynthia

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University.

出版信息

J Neurolinguistics. 2009 Jan 1;22(1):91-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.07.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.07.001
PMID:20428488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2859704/
Abstract

When multiple adjectives are used to modify a noun, they tend to be sequenced in the following way according to semantic class: value > size > dimension > various physical properties > color. To investigate the neural substrates of these semantic constraints on adjective order, we administered a battery of three tests to 34 brain-damaged patients and 19 healthy participants. Six patients manifested the following performance profile. First, they failed a test that required them to discriminate between semantically determined correct and incorrect sequences of adjectives-e.g., thick blue towel vs. *blue thick towel. Second, they passed a test that assessed their knowledge of two purely syntactic aspects of adjective order-specifically, that adjectives can precede nouns, and that adjectives can precede other adjectives. Finally, they also passed a test that assessed their knowledge of the categorical (i.e., class-level) features of adjective meanings that interact with the semantic constraints underlying adjective order-e.g., that thick is a dimensional adjective and that blue is a color adjective. Taken together, these behavioral findings suggest that the six patients have selectively impaired knowledge of the abstract principles that determine how different semantic classes of adjectives are typically mapped onto different syntactic positions in NPs. To identify the neuroanatomical lesion patterns that tend to correlate with defective processing of adjective order, we combined lesion data from the six patients just described with lesion data from six other patients who we reported in a previous study as having similar impairments [Kemmerer, D. (2000). Selective impairment of knowledge underlying adjective order: Evidence for the autonomy of grammatical semantics. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13, 57-82.] We found that the most common areas of damage included the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus and the left inferior parietal lobule. Overall, these results shed new light on the neural substrates of the syntax-semantics interface.

摘要

当多个形容词用于修饰一个名词时,它们往往会根据语义类别按以下方式排序:评价性形容词>大小>维度>各种物理属性>颜色。为了研究这些关于形容词顺序的语义限制的神经基础,我们对34名脑损伤患者和19名健康参与者进行了一系列三项测试。六名患者表现出以下行为特征。首先,他们在一项要求他们区分语义确定的正确和不正确形容词顺序的测试中失败了,例如,厚蓝色毛巾与*蓝色厚毛巾。其次,他们通过了一项评估他们对形容词顺序两个纯句法方面知识的测试,具体来说,形容词可以位于名词之前,并且形容词可以位于其他形容词之前。最后,他们还通过了一项评估他们对与形容词顺序背后的语义限制相互作用的形容词意义的类别(即类别层面)特征的知识的测试,例如,厚是一个维度形容词,蓝色是一个颜色形容词。综合起来,这些行为结果表明,这六名患者选择性地受损了关于决定不同语义类别的形容词通常如何映射到名词短语中不同句法位置的抽象原则的知识。为了确定往往与形容词顺序处理缺陷相关的神经解剖损伤模式,我们将刚刚描述的六名患者的损伤数据与我们在之前一项研究中报告的另外六名有类似损伤的患者的损伤数据相结合[凯默勒,D.(2000年)。形容词顺序背后知识的选择性损伤:语法语义自主性的证据。《神经语言学杂志》,13,57 - 82]。我们发现最常见的损伤区域包括左后下额叶回和左下顶叶小叶。总体而言,这些结果为句法 - 语义界面的神经基础提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e090/2859704/9bd7d19a3b27/nihms84787f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e090/2859704/9bd7d19a3b27/nihms84787f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e090/2859704/9bd7d19a3b27/nihms84787f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Knowledge of the Semantic Constraints on Adjective Order Can Be Selectively Impaired.关于形容词顺序的语义限制的知识可能会被选择性地损害。
J Neurolinguistics. 2009 Jan 1;22(1):91-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.07.001.
2
Semantic and syntactic composition of minimal adjective-noun phrases in Dutch: An MEG study.荷兰语中最小的形容词-名词短语的语义和句法构成:一项 MEG 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 May 14;155:107754. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107754. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
3
Syntax, morphosyntax, and serial recall: How language supports short-term memory.句法、形态句法和序列回忆:语言如何支持短期记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):174-191. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01203-z. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Syntax matters in shaping sensorimotor activation driven by nouns.名词驱动的感觉运动激活中,句法很重要。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):285-301. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01460-0. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
5
Prenominal adjective order is such a fat big deal because adjectives are ordered by likely need.前置形容词的顺序是一个非常重要的问题,因为形容词是按照可能的需求来排序的。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Feb;28(1):122-138. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01769-w.
6
How is sentence processing affected by external semantic and syntactic information? Evidence from event-related potentials.句子处理如何受到外部语义和句法信息的影响?来自事件相关电位的证据。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 17;5(3):e9742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009742.
7
Processing prenominal adjectives during sentence comprehension.名词前形容词在句义理解中的加工。
Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Aug;111(1):141-57. doi: 10.2466/11.22.28.PMS.111.4.141-157.
8
Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order.大棕色狗还是棕色大狗?关于名词前形容词顺序语义限制的电生理学研究。
Brain Lang. 2007 Mar;100(3):238-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
9
Differential cortical contribution of syntax and semantics: An fMRI study on two-word phrasal processing.句法和语义的皮质差异贡献:关于双词短语处理的 fMRI 研究。
Cortex. 2017 Nov;96:105-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
10
Behavioral and neural evidence on the processing of ambiguous adjective-noun dependencies in Korean sentence comprehension.关于韩语句子理解中模糊形容词 - 名词依存关系处理的行为和神经证据。
Brain Lang. 2019 Jan;188:28-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Template construction grammar: from visual scene description to language comprehension and agrammatism.模板结构语法:从视觉场景描述到语言理解和语法缺失。
Neuroinformatics. 2014 Jan;12(1):181-208. doi: 10.1007/s12021-013-9197-y.

本文引用的文献

1
"Broca's area" as a collective term?“布洛卡区”作为一个统称?
Brain Lang. 2007 Jul;102(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.11.012. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
2
A neurolinguistic model of grammatical construction processing.语法结构处理的神经语言学模型。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Dec;18(12):2088-107. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.12.2088.
3
A Parallel Architecture perspective on language processing.关于语言处理的并行架构视角。
Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:2-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.111. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
4
The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages.扩展论证依存模型:一种跨语言句子理解的神经认知方法。
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):787-821. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.787.
5
When Broca experiences the Janus syndrome: an ER-fMRI study comparing sentence comprehension and cognitive sequence processing.当布罗卡区出现两面神综合征时:一项比较句子理解和认知序列处理的事件相关功能磁共振成像研究。
Cortex. 2006 May;42(4):605-23. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70398-8.
6
Dynamic anticipatory processing of hierarchical sequential events: a common role for Broca's area and ventral premotor cortex across domains?分层序列事件的动态预期加工:布罗卡区和腹侧运动前皮层在不同领域的共同作用?
Cortex. 2006 May;42(4):499-502. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70386-1.
7
Structure mapping and semantic integration in a construction-based neurolinguistic model of sentence processing.句子处理的基于构建的神经语言模型中的结构映射与语义整合
Cortex. 2006 May;42(4):476-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70381-2.
8
The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience.空间的语义学:融合语言类型学与认知神经科学
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(9):1607-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.025. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
9
Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order.大棕色狗还是棕色大狗?关于名词前形容词顺序语义限制的电生理学研究。
Brain Lang. 2007 Mar;100(3):238-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
10
On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework.论布洛卡区、大脑与联结:一个新框架。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004.