Svendsen Erik R, Whittle Nancy C, Sanders Louisiana, McKeown Robert E, Sprayberry Karen, Heim Margaret, Caldwell Richard, Gibson James J, Vena John E
Arnold School of Public Health and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, SC, USA.
Arch Environ Occup Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;65(2):77-85. doi: 10.1080/19338240903390222.
Different approaches are necessary when community-based participatory research (CBPR) of environmental illness is initiated after an environmental disaster within a community. Often such events are viewed as golden scientific opportunities to do epidemiological studies. However, the authors believe that in such circumstances, community engagement and empowerment needs to be integrated into the public health service efforts in order for both those and any science to be successful, with special care being taken to address the immediate health needs of the community first, rather than the pressing needs to answer important scientific questions. The authors will demonstrate how they have simultaneously provided valuable public health service, embedded generalizable scientific knowledge, and built a successful foundation for supplemental CBPR through their on-going recovery work after the chlorine gas disaster in Graniteville, South Carolina.
当在社区内发生环境灾难后启动基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)来研究环境疾病时,需要采取不同的方法。这类事件通常被视为进行流行病学研究的绝佳科学机会。然而,作者认为,在这种情况下,社区参与和赋权需要融入公共卫生服务工作中,以便这些工作和任何科学研究都能取得成功,同时要特别注意首先满足社区的即时健康需求,而不是急于回答重要科学问题的迫切需求。作者将通过他们在南卡罗来纳州格兰尼特维尔氯气灾难后的持续恢复工作,展示他们如何同时提供了有价值的公共卫生服务、融入了可推广的科学知识,并为补充性的社区参与性研究建立了成功的基础。